Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs) Col. (ret.) Dr. Jacques Neriah - The unprecedented blow suffered by Hizbullah at the hands of Israel brought drastic changes to the Lebanese reality. Suddenly, Hizbullah was a subject of criticism and mockery in Lebanon. Due to Hassan Nasrallah's opening of a "support front" facing Israel, 22 out 29 villages on the border with Israel were erased, while more than 60,000 houses were damaged and 120,000 residents of southern Lebanon had to flee. Hizbullah was accused of taking part in a war that did not concern the Lebanese at all. The Israeli response to the Hizbullah attack created a new reality. The power equation of mutual deterrence between Israel and Hizbullah that existed since 2006 was brushed away by Israel. Discovering Hizbullah's weakness, presidential elections, which Hizbullah had blocked, were held, and Joseph Aoun, the former army chief and a pro-American candidate, was elected president in January. Hizbullah lost the veto right it had held in previous governments. Forty custom officers who served the interests of Hizbullah at Beirut International Airport were fired. The landing of Iranian planes carrying cash to the militia was forbidden. The most significant blow to Hizbullah is the establishment of a new Sunni anti-Iranian and anti-Hizbullah regime in Syria, which stopped being the route through which weapons, manpower, sophisticated technologies, and money sent by Iran reached Lebanon. Yet, little by little, Hizbullah has come back to center stage. While the government has asked all militias in Lebanon to surrender their weapons, Hizbullah could not accept this. President Aoun knows he cannot order the army to disarm Hizbullah. His army would disintegrate into sectarian units after any such attempt. The writer, a special analyst for the Middle East at the Jerusalem Center, was formerly Deputy Head for Assessment of Israeli Military Intelligence. 2025-10-09 00:00:00Full Article
What Is Hizbullah's Future?
(Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs) Col. (ret.) Dr. Jacques Neriah - The unprecedented blow suffered by Hizbullah at the hands of Israel brought drastic changes to the Lebanese reality. Suddenly, Hizbullah was a subject of criticism and mockery in Lebanon. Due to Hassan Nasrallah's opening of a "support front" facing Israel, 22 out 29 villages on the border with Israel were erased, while more than 60,000 houses were damaged and 120,000 residents of southern Lebanon had to flee. Hizbullah was accused of taking part in a war that did not concern the Lebanese at all. The Israeli response to the Hizbullah attack created a new reality. The power equation of mutual deterrence between Israel and Hizbullah that existed since 2006 was brushed away by Israel. Discovering Hizbullah's weakness, presidential elections, which Hizbullah had blocked, were held, and Joseph Aoun, the former army chief and a pro-American candidate, was elected president in January. Hizbullah lost the veto right it had held in previous governments. Forty custom officers who served the interests of Hizbullah at Beirut International Airport were fired. The landing of Iranian planes carrying cash to the militia was forbidden. The most significant blow to Hizbullah is the establishment of a new Sunni anti-Iranian and anti-Hizbullah regime in Syria, which stopped being the route through which weapons, manpower, sophisticated technologies, and money sent by Iran reached Lebanon. Yet, little by little, Hizbullah has come back to center stage. While the government has asked all militias in Lebanon to surrender their weapons, Hizbullah could not accept this. President Aoun knows he cannot order the army to disarm Hizbullah. His army would disintegrate into sectarian units after any such attempt. The writer, a special analyst for the Middle East at the Jerusalem Center, was formerly Deputy Head for Assessment of Israeli Military Intelligence. 2025-10-09 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|