Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(RealClearPolitics) Josh Hammer - Four of America's nominally closest allies - Britain, Australia, France and Canada - disgraced themselves by recognizing a so-called Palestinian state. In so doing, these nations rewarded terrorism and strengthened the genocidal ambitions of the global jihad. They also sent a chilling message: The path to international legitimacy runs not through the difficult work of building up a nation-state but through mass murder, the weaponization of transnational institutions, and the erasure of historical truth. Such a recognition is an abdication not only of basic human decency but of national interest and strategic sanity. Many pretend that the radical jihadists of Hamas do not represent the broader Palestinian-Arab population, but that is a lie. Polls consistently show - and anecdotal videos of large street crowds consistently demonstrate - that Hamas and likeminded jihadist groups maintain overwhelming popularity in both Gaza and Judea and Samaria. This is a radicalized population that deserves scorn and diplomatic rebuke - not fawning sympathy and UN red carpets. The "government" in Gaza is a theocratic, Iranian-backed terror entity whose founding charter drips with unrepentant Jew-hatred and whose leaders routinely celebrate the slaughter of innocent Israelis as triumphs. There is no meaningful "peace partner," and no "two-state" vision to be realized, amidst this horrible reality. For decades, Western leaders maintained that there can be no recognition of a "Palestinian" state outside of direct negotiations with Israel, full demilitarization, and the unqualified acceptance of Israel's right to exist in secure borders. The move to recognize a "Palestinian" state at the UN torches that policy. Undermining America's strongest ally in the Middle East while simultaneously carving out yet another new terror-friendly Islamist state directly harms the American national interest. As long as the Jewish state stands on the front lines of civilization, the United States must remain at its side, unwavering, unbowed and unashamed. 2025-09-30 00:00:00Full Article
The Folly of "Palestinian" Statehood
(RealClearPolitics) Josh Hammer - Four of America's nominally closest allies - Britain, Australia, France and Canada - disgraced themselves by recognizing a so-called Palestinian state. In so doing, these nations rewarded terrorism and strengthened the genocidal ambitions of the global jihad. They also sent a chilling message: The path to international legitimacy runs not through the difficult work of building up a nation-state but through mass murder, the weaponization of transnational institutions, and the erasure of historical truth. Such a recognition is an abdication not only of basic human decency but of national interest and strategic sanity. Many pretend that the radical jihadists of Hamas do not represent the broader Palestinian-Arab population, but that is a lie. Polls consistently show - and anecdotal videos of large street crowds consistently demonstrate - that Hamas and likeminded jihadist groups maintain overwhelming popularity in both Gaza and Judea and Samaria. This is a radicalized population that deserves scorn and diplomatic rebuke - not fawning sympathy and UN red carpets. The "government" in Gaza is a theocratic, Iranian-backed terror entity whose founding charter drips with unrepentant Jew-hatred and whose leaders routinely celebrate the slaughter of innocent Israelis as triumphs. There is no meaningful "peace partner," and no "two-state" vision to be realized, amidst this horrible reality. For decades, Western leaders maintained that there can be no recognition of a "Palestinian" state outside of direct negotiations with Israel, full demilitarization, and the unqualified acceptance of Israel's right to exist in secure borders. The move to recognize a "Palestinian" state at the UN torches that policy. Undermining America's strongest ally in the Middle East while simultaneously carving out yet another new terror-friendly Islamist state directly harms the American national interest. As long as the Jewish state stands on the front lines of civilization, the United States must remain at its side, unwavering, unbowed and unashamed. 2025-09-30 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|