Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(U.S. Mission to the UN) Morgan Ortagus, Deputy U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East, told the UN Security Council on Thursday: "U.S. opposition to this resolution will come as no surprise. It fails to condemn Hamas or recognize Israel's right to defend itself and it wrongly legitimizes the false narratives benefiting Hamas, which have sadly found currency in this Council....The Council instead opted for a performative action - designed to draw a veto." "Let's recall that Hamas started this brutal conflict on Oct. 7, 2023, when it perpetrated the worst massacre and kidnapping of Jews since the Holocaust. To the approval of its supporters, who took to the streets on Oct. 8 to praise what Hamas had done, Hamas promises to repeat Oct. 7. Despite everything, Hamas has no regrets. The lives of Gaza's civilians in harm's way are mere tools in the project to destroy Israel." "We have seen the chilling videos and images of how Hamas has starved the hostages. In this Council we have heard heart-rending testimony from freed hostages of how Hamas brutalized and sexually assaulted them during their captivity. Hamas is responsible for starting and continuing this war. Israel has accepted proposed terms that would end the war, but Hamas continues to reject them. This war could end today if Hamas freed the hostages and laid down its arms." "The resolution seeks an 'immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire' that would leave Hamas in a position to carry out future Oct. 7 attacks, as it has threatened to do so many times. This resolution draws a dangerous false equivalence between Israel and Hamas. There can be no equating the two. Full stop. The hostages in this resolution are a mere afterthought. The United States will never accept this." "This resolution also refuses to acknowledge and seeks to return to a failed system that has allowed Hamas to enrich and strengthen itself at the expense of civilians in need....Gaza has humanitarian needs because of Hamas, and because the international community turned a blind eye to the true use of the billions in aid that it provided....This resolution fails to recognize the reality on the ground that there has been a meaningful increase in the flow of humanitarian aid." 2025-09-21 00:00:00Full Article
U.S. Tells UN: "Israel Has Accepted Proposed Terms that Would End the War, but Hamas Continues to Reject Them"
(U.S. Mission to the UN) Morgan Ortagus, Deputy U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East, told the UN Security Council on Thursday: "U.S. opposition to this resolution will come as no surprise. It fails to condemn Hamas or recognize Israel's right to defend itself and it wrongly legitimizes the false narratives benefiting Hamas, which have sadly found currency in this Council....The Council instead opted for a performative action - designed to draw a veto." "Let's recall that Hamas started this brutal conflict on Oct. 7, 2023, when it perpetrated the worst massacre and kidnapping of Jews since the Holocaust. To the approval of its supporters, who took to the streets on Oct. 8 to praise what Hamas had done, Hamas promises to repeat Oct. 7. Despite everything, Hamas has no regrets. The lives of Gaza's civilians in harm's way are mere tools in the project to destroy Israel." "We have seen the chilling videos and images of how Hamas has starved the hostages. In this Council we have heard heart-rending testimony from freed hostages of how Hamas brutalized and sexually assaulted them during their captivity. Hamas is responsible for starting and continuing this war. Israel has accepted proposed terms that would end the war, but Hamas continues to reject them. This war could end today if Hamas freed the hostages and laid down its arms." "The resolution seeks an 'immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire' that would leave Hamas in a position to carry out future Oct. 7 attacks, as it has threatened to do so many times. This resolution draws a dangerous false equivalence between Israel and Hamas. There can be no equating the two. Full stop. The hostages in this resolution are a mere afterthought. The United States will never accept this." "This resolution also refuses to acknowledge and seeks to return to a failed system that has allowed Hamas to enrich and strengthen itself at the expense of civilians in need....Gaza has humanitarian needs because of Hamas, and because the international community turned a blind eye to the true use of the billions in aid that it provided....This resolution fails to recognize the reality on the ground that there has been a meaningful increase in the flow of humanitarian aid." 2025-09-21 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|