Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Spiked-UK) Brendan O'Neill - You can judge a person by which side they're taking in the clash between Israel and the neo-fascists of Hamas. Much of the media coverage leaves one with the wholly post-truth impression that the IDF is raiding Gaza City for sport. Or for land. Or in further, feverish pursuit of its curiously unsuccessful "genocide" of the Palestinian people. The other side in the battle - Hamas's army of apocalyptic Jew-haters - has been virtually invisibilized. It's as bizarre as if newspapers had reported on the Battle of Raqqa without mentioning ISIS, or the Battle of Berlin without ever saying the word "Nazi." It's a kind of wartime censorship to erase the side that started the war in the first place. A UN commission of inquiry reported that Israel is committing genocide. Its proof? That "Israeli security forces were aware that their military operations since 7 October 2023 would cause the deaths of Palestinians in Gaza." By this infantile definition - basically, your military action caused casualties - every war in history has been a genocide. If you tell only one side in an existential war to cease fire, then you're objectively aligning with the other side. When I hear the opinion-forming classes squawk "Stop Israel," they've decided, however witlessly, that the security of the Jewish nation is of less moral worth than the deranged ambitions of Hamas. This is a battle between the army of a democratic nation and a terrorist militia that loathes the infidel West as much as it does the Jews. Pick a side.2025-09-18 00:00:00Full Article
The Battle of Gaza City: The Jewish State Must Be Victorious over the Islamist Hysterics of Hamas
(Spiked-UK) Brendan O'Neill - You can judge a person by which side they're taking in the clash between Israel and the neo-fascists of Hamas. Much of the media coverage leaves one with the wholly post-truth impression that the IDF is raiding Gaza City for sport. Or for land. Or in further, feverish pursuit of its curiously unsuccessful "genocide" of the Palestinian people. The other side in the battle - Hamas's army of apocalyptic Jew-haters - has been virtually invisibilized. It's as bizarre as if newspapers had reported on the Battle of Raqqa without mentioning ISIS, or the Battle of Berlin without ever saying the word "Nazi." It's a kind of wartime censorship to erase the side that started the war in the first place. A UN commission of inquiry reported that Israel is committing genocide. Its proof? That "Israeli security forces were aware that their military operations since 7 October 2023 would cause the deaths of Palestinians in Gaza." By this infantile definition - basically, your military action caused casualties - every war in history has been a genocide. If you tell only one side in an existential war to cease fire, then you're objectively aligning with the other side. When I hear the opinion-forming classes squawk "Stop Israel," they've decided, however witlessly, that the security of the Jewish nation is of less moral worth than the deranged ambitions of Hamas. This is a battle between the army of a democratic nation and a terrorist militia that loathes the infidel West as much as it does the Jews. Pick a side.2025-09-18 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|