Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Times of Israel) Anne Bayefsky - At the UN last week, a three-day confab sought to promote a plan to create a permanent existential threat to the state of Israel and terminate the paradigm of a negotiated settlement. The U.S. and Israel refused to join the antisemitic mob mentality or to sign on to the "New York Declaration," which sets out to impose on Israel what Palestinians want instead of facilitating negotiations between the parties, contrary to legally-binding prior agreements. Led by France and Saudi Arabia, the assembled gang met to conjure up support for immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. The declaration decides all the elements that were supposed to be subject to negotiations as listed in the Oslo agreements, including borders, settlements and Jerusalem. Negotiations are mentioned at the tail end vaguely because there is nothing left to negotiate. It demands Israel hand over fistfuls of money to the Palestinians - in the full knowledge that those dollars bankroll the pay-to-slay outrage. A Palestinian state is to come before "mutual recognition" of the Jewish state. It obscenely equates innocent Israeli hostages with Palestinian convicts having blood on their hands. It supports the Hamas practice of denying Palestinians a host of human rights: the right to flee, the right to leave any country including one's own, and the right to seek asylum. It supports the deployment of international troops allegedly to protect Palestinian civilians, without Israeli approval. It preposterously praises the Palestinian Authority, which it claims should "continue implementing its credible reform agenda" - despite the fact that the PA has failed to implement any credible reforms for thirty years. It talks about protection of "legal and historical...Islamic and Christian" claims in Jerusalem and says nothing about Jewish claims, Jewish history, or Judaism's holiest sites. The writer is president of Human Rights Voices and director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust. 2025-08-05 00:00:00Full Article
The "New York Declaration" and Its Two-State Lie
(Times of Israel) Anne Bayefsky - At the UN last week, a three-day confab sought to promote a plan to create a permanent existential threat to the state of Israel and terminate the paradigm of a negotiated settlement. The U.S. and Israel refused to join the antisemitic mob mentality or to sign on to the "New York Declaration," which sets out to impose on Israel what Palestinians want instead of facilitating negotiations between the parties, contrary to legally-binding prior agreements. Led by France and Saudi Arabia, the assembled gang met to conjure up support for immediate recognition of a Palestinian state. The declaration decides all the elements that were supposed to be subject to negotiations as listed in the Oslo agreements, including borders, settlements and Jerusalem. Negotiations are mentioned at the tail end vaguely because there is nothing left to negotiate. It demands Israel hand over fistfuls of money to the Palestinians - in the full knowledge that those dollars bankroll the pay-to-slay outrage. A Palestinian state is to come before "mutual recognition" of the Jewish state. It obscenely equates innocent Israeli hostages with Palestinian convicts having blood on their hands. It supports the Hamas practice of denying Palestinians a host of human rights: the right to flee, the right to leave any country including one's own, and the right to seek asylum. It supports the deployment of international troops allegedly to protect Palestinian civilians, without Israeli approval. It preposterously praises the Palestinian Authority, which it claims should "continue implementing its credible reform agenda" - despite the fact that the PA has failed to implement any credible reforms for thirty years. It talks about protection of "legal and historical...Islamic and Christian" claims in Jerusalem and says nothing about Jewish claims, Jewish history, or Judaism's holiest sites. The writer is president of Human Rights Voices and director of the Touro Institute on Human Rights and the Holocaust. 2025-08-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|