Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(X) Maj. (ret.) John Spencer - To claim that Israel has already achieved its goals and should end the war is not accurate and is disconnected from reality. Likewise, saying that Israel cannot achieve its goals is also untrue. Israel's goals in Gaza, as stated clearly and consistently by its political leadership, are: return all hostages; dismantle Hamas's military capabilities and end its political rule in Gaza; and ensure that Gaza never again poses a threat to Israel. These three goals are both legal and just in the aftermath of the Oct. 7 attack, when Hamas invaded Israel. In response, Israel exercised its rights under Article 51 of the UN Charter and declared a self-defense war against Hamas. This legal framework affirms the inherent right of a nation to defend itself following an armed assault, and Israel's military operations in Gaza are grounded in that right. Many commentators rely on double standards that are applied only to Israel, such as measuring legal adherence to the laws of war by citing daily casualty counts from the enemy force, which is an internationally designated terrorist organization. This is not how war is assessed for any other nation. Moreover, the idea that an attacking military must present a plan for replacement governance before the opposing force has been defeated through force or surrender is another double standard. Victory and defeat must come first. Replacement comes after, not before. Israel has been providing humanitarian aid to the enemy's population during wartime, while battles are ongoing, while the enemy still controls territory, continues to launch attacks, and holds hostages. Israel has done this out of moral responsibility and to balance military objectives with humanitarian imperatives. However, the argument that this is a legal requirement is a double standard. The writer is chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point. 2025-08-03 00:00:00Full Article
Israel's Goals in Gaza Are Legal and Just
(X) Maj. (ret.) John Spencer - To claim that Israel has already achieved its goals and should end the war is not accurate and is disconnected from reality. Likewise, saying that Israel cannot achieve its goals is also untrue. Israel's goals in Gaza, as stated clearly and consistently by its political leadership, are: return all hostages; dismantle Hamas's military capabilities and end its political rule in Gaza; and ensure that Gaza never again poses a threat to Israel. These three goals are both legal and just in the aftermath of the Oct. 7 attack, when Hamas invaded Israel. In response, Israel exercised its rights under Article 51 of the UN Charter and declared a self-defense war against Hamas. This legal framework affirms the inherent right of a nation to defend itself following an armed assault, and Israel's military operations in Gaza are grounded in that right. Many commentators rely on double standards that are applied only to Israel, such as measuring legal adherence to the laws of war by citing daily casualty counts from the enemy force, which is an internationally designated terrorist organization. This is not how war is assessed for any other nation. Moreover, the idea that an attacking military must present a plan for replacement governance before the opposing force has been defeated through force or surrender is another double standard. Victory and defeat must come first. Replacement comes after, not before. Israel has been providing humanitarian aid to the enemy's population during wartime, while battles are ongoing, while the enemy still controls territory, continues to launch attacks, and holds hostages. Israel has done this out of moral responsibility and to balance military objectives with humanitarian imperatives. However, the argument that this is a legal requirement is a double standard. The writer is chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point. 2025-08-03 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|