Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs) Dr. Dan Diker - The ongoing Islamic invasion and massacre of civilians in the Druze town of Sweida - known in the West as "sectaran violence" - is, more accurately, part of the ongoing jihad. Israel, as the strongest minority community in the Arab Muslim-majority Middle East, is setting a new post-Oct. 7 standard of response. Israel is committed to protecting its Druze citizens and its extended family in Syria, driven by shared minority identity and moral obligation. The Iran-backed Hamas massacre on Oct. 7 has only strengthened Israel's determination to prevent mass atrocities of other regional friendly minorities. Israel's security depends on establishing clear red lines around minority persecution. The catalyst for Israel's action was not the Sweida violence alone, but the likelihood of Syrian-based terror groups continuing to stream southward toward Israel's northern border. Israel's response also reflects its evolving national security doctrine following Oct. 7, which prioritizes prevention over reaction, preemption over containment. When violence threatens to spill into Israeli territory or endanger Israeli citizens, the default response has become decisive intervention to eliminate threats at their source - a fundamental shift from the old doctrine of "quiet for quiet." The new doctrine is "stability and peace through strength" - sometimes requiring striking first and striking hard. Israel is acting to prevent jihadists from moving south towards its border. The uncomfortable truth Western policymakers struggle to acknowledge is that many Islamist movements - Sunni, Shiite, or derivatives - share a fundamental goal of eliminating or subjugating non-Muslim "infidels." This is a theological imperative, not a political grievance resolvable through diplomatic accommodation. The test of Islamist moderation isn't what its leaders say in Washington, but how they treat religious minorities when no one's watching. The writer is president of the Jerusalem Center.2025-07-22 00:00:00Full Article
Understanding Israel's Strikes on Syria: Prevention, Security, Perception in the Shadow of Iran
(Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs) Dr. Dan Diker - The ongoing Islamic invasion and massacre of civilians in the Druze town of Sweida - known in the West as "sectaran violence" - is, more accurately, part of the ongoing jihad. Israel, as the strongest minority community in the Arab Muslim-majority Middle East, is setting a new post-Oct. 7 standard of response. Israel is committed to protecting its Druze citizens and its extended family in Syria, driven by shared minority identity and moral obligation. The Iran-backed Hamas massacre on Oct. 7 has only strengthened Israel's determination to prevent mass atrocities of other regional friendly minorities. Israel's security depends on establishing clear red lines around minority persecution. The catalyst for Israel's action was not the Sweida violence alone, but the likelihood of Syrian-based terror groups continuing to stream southward toward Israel's northern border. Israel's response also reflects its evolving national security doctrine following Oct. 7, which prioritizes prevention over reaction, preemption over containment. When violence threatens to spill into Israeli territory or endanger Israeli citizens, the default response has become decisive intervention to eliminate threats at their source - a fundamental shift from the old doctrine of "quiet for quiet." The new doctrine is "stability and peace through strength" - sometimes requiring striking first and striking hard. Israel is acting to prevent jihadists from moving south towards its border. The uncomfortable truth Western policymakers struggle to acknowledge is that many Islamist movements - Sunni, Shiite, or derivatives - share a fundamental goal of eliminating or subjugating non-Muslim "infidels." This is a theological imperative, not a political grievance resolvable through diplomatic accommodation. The test of Islamist moderation isn't what its leaders say in Washington, but how they treat religious minorities when no one's watching. The writer is president of the Jerusalem Center.2025-07-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|