Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(American Spectator) Gerald Steinberg - With the end of the 12-day war, the question of regime change in Iran remains central. To assess this scenario, it is useful to consider the collapse of the Soviet Union that began with the catastrophic accident at the nuclear reactor at Chernobyl in April 1986. Moscow tried to cover-up the disaster to avoid embarrassment, like the response in Tehran. The Chernobyl catastrophe symbolized a closed and incompetent political system that endangered the entire population, and the institutions lost legitimacy, power, and control. In examining the prospects of a similar scenario in Iran, many of the same factors are evident. The regime maintains power through repressive power and secrecy, but the Israeli military quickly destroyed Iran's defenses, followed by 12 days of continuous attacks, highlighting the government's vulnerability and incompetence. As in the Soviet strategy after Chernobyl, Tehran's propaganda platforms, including statements by the Supreme Leader, are desperately attempting to control the narrative by denying the blatant failures and making absurd claims of a great victory over the Zionist enemy. In Russia, the public greeted such efforts with sarcasm and derision. In the case of the Soviet Union, the erosion of legitimacy took four years until the final collapse. While there is no guarantee of regime change, the openings have been created. The writer is President of NGO Monitor and emeritus professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University. 2025-07-10 00:00:00Full Article
Tehran Regime Change: Lessons from Chernobyl
(American Spectator) Gerald Steinberg - With the end of the 12-day war, the question of regime change in Iran remains central. To assess this scenario, it is useful to consider the collapse of the Soviet Union that began with the catastrophic accident at the nuclear reactor at Chernobyl in April 1986. Moscow tried to cover-up the disaster to avoid embarrassment, like the response in Tehran. The Chernobyl catastrophe symbolized a closed and incompetent political system that endangered the entire population, and the institutions lost legitimacy, power, and control. In examining the prospects of a similar scenario in Iran, many of the same factors are evident. The regime maintains power through repressive power and secrecy, but the Israeli military quickly destroyed Iran's defenses, followed by 12 days of continuous attacks, highlighting the government's vulnerability and incompetence. As in the Soviet strategy after Chernobyl, Tehran's propaganda platforms, including statements by the Supreme Leader, are desperately attempting to control the narrative by denying the blatant failures and making absurd claims of a great victory over the Zionist enemy. In Russia, the public greeted such efforts with sarcasm and derision. In the case of the Soviet Union, the erosion of legitimacy took four years until the final collapse. While there is no guarantee of regime change, the openings have been created. The writer is President of NGO Monitor and emeritus professor of political studies at Bar-Ilan University. 2025-07-10 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|