Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Free Beacon) Douglas J. Feith - America has a vital interest in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons. For the first time, the U.S. used a military attack to stop a country from acquiring a nuclear bomb. Americans are now safer than they were. Many U.S. presidents threatened military force to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, but until now those threats were of doubtful credibility. Any country seeking a nuclear bomb - or considering providing one to others - now understands the U.S. may use force against it. This credible threat will make nonproliferation diplomacy more effective. The strike against Iran reinforces the point that rogue states pursuing nuclear weapons will face not just disapproving diplomacy and economic sanctions but maybe also military destruction. The writer, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, served as U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy.2025-07-03 00:00:00Full Article
Americans Are Safer after Attack on Iran Nuclear Sites
(Washington Free Beacon) Douglas J. Feith - America has a vital interest in preventing the spread of nuclear weapons. For the first time, the U.S. used a military attack to stop a country from acquiring a nuclear bomb. Americans are now safer than they were. Many U.S. presidents threatened military force to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, but until now those threats were of doubtful credibility. Any country seeking a nuclear bomb - or considering providing one to others - now understands the U.S. may use force against it. This credible threat will make nonproliferation diplomacy more effective. The strike against Iran reinforces the point that rogue states pursuing nuclear weapons will face not just disapproving diplomacy and economic sanctions but maybe also military destruction. The writer, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, served as U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy.2025-07-03 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|