Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jewish Chronicle-UK) Lorin Bell-Cross - Israel's opposition leader Yair Lapid told Parliament's Foreign Affairs Select Committee on Tuesday that he was in full agreement with Prime Minister Netanyahu on the need to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. "I saw the intelligence; we were facing an existential threat. I supported the goals of the operation," he said. Lapid said that Iran's increased defense manufacturing "would have allowed them to have more ballistic missiles than Russia in less than two years. We have hit all this, and it is a good thing. The world is a safer place than it was 12 days ago....Not only were they enriching uranium, not only had they developed the next generation of centrifuges...they were running for a bomb." Questioned by Labour MP Alex Ballinger about whether the action was legal, Lapid retorted: "What is the committee's position on an atomic bomb exploding in Israel in terms of international law?...We saw the intelligence that tells us that Iran is rushing to a bomb and international law can't do anything about it." "The Iranians...are talking about two sides of an equation, while there are no two sides of an equation. This is a regime we have no problem with that says they want to kill all the Jews because they're Jews, because this is the deep, radical twisted version of Islam." Lapid said that any future agreement had to have five basic conditions: no uranium enrichment inside Iran, no centrifuges, all enriched uranium has to be deposited outside of Iran, no ballistic missile program, and unlimited supervision. Lapid added, "In order to discuss the two-state solution, the Palestinians have to prove to us that this doesn't become the base of the next attack against the Israeli people, against the innocent women and children who were attacked on October 7." 2025-06-26 00:00:00Full Article
Israeli Opposition Leader Yair Lapid Tells Parliament: The Iranians "Were Running for a Bomb"
(Jewish Chronicle-UK) Lorin Bell-Cross - Israel's opposition leader Yair Lapid told Parliament's Foreign Affairs Select Committee on Tuesday that he was in full agreement with Prime Minister Netanyahu on the need to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. "I saw the intelligence; we were facing an existential threat. I supported the goals of the operation," he said. Lapid said that Iran's increased defense manufacturing "would have allowed them to have more ballistic missiles than Russia in less than two years. We have hit all this, and it is a good thing. The world is a safer place than it was 12 days ago....Not only were they enriching uranium, not only had they developed the next generation of centrifuges...they were running for a bomb." Questioned by Labour MP Alex Ballinger about whether the action was legal, Lapid retorted: "What is the committee's position on an atomic bomb exploding in Israel in terms of international law?...We saw the intelligence that tells us that Iran is rushing to a bomb and international law can't do anything about it." "The Iranians...are talking about two sides of an equation, while there are no two sides of an equation. This is a regime we have no problem with that says they want to kill all the Jews because they're Jews, because this is the deep, radical twisted version of Islam." Lapid said that any future agreement had to have five basic conditions: no uranium enrichment inside Iran, no centrifuges, all enriched uranium has to be deposited outside of Iran, no ballistic missile program, and unlimited supervision. Lapid added, "In order to discuss the two-state solution, the Palestinians have to prove to us that this doesn't become the base of the next attack against the Israeli people, against the innocent women and children who were attacked on October 7." 2025-06-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|