Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Maj. (ret.) John Spencer - Iran is not Iraq. It is not Afghanistan. This is not the same war. Israel and the U.S. are not talking about regime change. This is preemption. The mission is clear and limited. It is to irreversibly destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program, not to occupy Tehran, rebuild Iran's government, or democratize the Middle East. I was on the ground in Iraq as an American soldier, sent on missions to find weapons of mass destruction that were not there. That is not the case with Iran. The IAEA has verified uranium enriched to 83.7%. It has documented missing stockpiles and hidden facilities. The U.S. is not at war with Iran, but it carried out a singular, strategic strike that only it could conduct, targeting Iran's most hardened and deeply buried nuclear enrichment facilities. This was not just about assisting an ally. It was about doing what only the U.S. could do to stop the Islamic Republic from becoming a nuclear-armed state. This was not a prelude to war. It was a deliberate, proportional military action to send a clear signal. Iran's path to a nuclear bomb will not be tolerated. This was not a hypothetical threat. It was real, immediate, and accelerating. Waiting did not reduce the threat. It allowed it to harden. Every day of delay gave Iran more time to disperse its program, develop more advanced delivery systems, and raise the cost of future action. The window to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran was closing. Acting when we did was not escalation. It was prevention. The writer is chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point. 2025-06-24 00:00:00Full Article
No, U.S. Strikes on Iran Are Not the Start of a New "Forever War" in the Middle East
(Jerusalem Post) Maj. (ret.) John Spencer - Iran is not Iraq. It is not Afghanistan. This is not the same war. Israel and the U.S. are not talking about regime change. This is preemption. The mission is clear and limited. It is to irreversibly destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program, not to occupy Tehran, rebuild Iran's government, or democratize the Middle East. I was on the ground in Iraq as an American soldier, sent on missions to find weapons of mass destruction that were not there. That is not the case with Iran. The IAEA has verified uranium enriched to 83.7%. It has documented missing stockpiles and hidden facilities. The U.S. is not at war with Iran, but it carried out a singular, strategic strike that only it could conduct, targeting Iran's most hardened and deeply buried nuclear enrichment facilities. This was not just about assisting an ally. It was about doing what only the U.S. could do to stop the Islamic Republic from becoming a nuclear-armed state. This was not a prelude to war. It was a deliberate, proportional military action to send a clear signal. Iran's path to a nuclear bomb will not be tolerated. This was not a hypothetical threat. It was real, immediate, and accelerating. Waiting did not reduce the threat. It allowed it to harden. Every day of delay gave Iran more time to disperse its program, develop more advanced delivery systems, and raise the cost of future action. The window to prevent a nuclear-armed Iran was closing. Acting when we did was not escalation. It was prevention. The writer is chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point. 2025-06-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|