Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Times of Israel) Yossi Klein Halevi - Power is not the answer to all problems. But neither is restraint. If you have the power to prevent the world's biggest exporter of terrorism from developing nuclear immunity yet fail to use it, then disarm, embrace pacifism, and prepare to suffer the consequences. To those who blame President Trump for abandoning the JCPOA - Barack Obama's deal with Iran - consider this: Had the JCPOA still been in effect, its "sunset clause," allowing Iran to produce advanced centrifuges capable of enriching uranium to weapons-grade level in a matter of weeks, would be coming into effect around now. At the same time, the JCPOA would have permitted Iran to continue developing nuclear warheads and delivery systems. For the last 40 years, the Iranian regime has consistently expressed, in rhetoric and policy, its intention to destroy the Jewish state. Yet the international community took those threats and actions in stride. There are moments when leaders need to decisively deal with an existential threat and not allow fear of the consequences to paralyze them. We will deal with the consequences as they unfold. Had Israel listened to the warnings of some of its well-intentioned friends not to go to war on Oct. 8, we would still be surrounded on most of our borders by terror entities committed to our destruction. Israel's stunning achievement in breaking that vise refutes the pessimists. Hamas's massacre of Israelis was not an expression of an oppressed people revolting against occupation, as much of the world believes; it was the latest phase of the radical Islamist war against Israel's existence. For the last 18 months, we have been fighting Iran's proxies. Now, finally and inevitably, we have taken the war to its source. The writer is a senior fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute. 2025-06-23 00:00:00Full Article
The Attack on Iran Had to Be Done
(Times of Israel) Yossi Klein Halevi - Power is not the answer to all problems. But neither is restraint. If you have the power to prevent the world's biggest exporter of terrorism from developing nuclear immunity yet fail to use it, then disarm, embrace pacifism, and prepare to suffer the consequences. To those who blame President Trump for abandoning the JCPOA - Barack Obama's deal with Iran - consider this: Had the JCPOA still been in effect, its "sunset clause," allowing Iran to produce advanced centrifuges capable of enriching uranium to weapons-grade level in a matter of weeks, would be coming into effect around now. At the same time, the JCPOA would have permitted Iran to continue developing nuclear warheads and delivery systems. For the last 40 years, the Iranian regime has consistently expressed, in rhetoric and policy, its intention to destroy the Jewish state. Yet the international community took those threats and actions in stride. There are moments when leaders need to decisively deal with an existential threat and not allow fear of the consequences to paralyze them. We will deal with the consequences as they unfold. Had Israel listened to the warnings of some of its well-intentioned friends not to go to war on Oct. 8, we would still be surrounded on most of our borders by terror entities committed to our destruction. Israel's stunning achievement in breaking that vise refutes the pessimists. Hamas's massacre of Israelis was not an expression of an oppressed people revolting against occupation, as much of the world believes; it was the latest phase of the radical Islamist war against Israel's existence. For the last 18 months, we have been fighting Iran's proxies. Now, finally and inevitably, we have taken the war to its source. The writer is a senior fellow at the Shalom Hartman Institute. 2025-06-23 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|