Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Yaakov Katz - Israel's strike on Iran's nuclear facilities took advantage of a unique window of opportunity. For years, when the issue of attacking Iran would come up, one of the main arguments against it was the retaliation Israel would face from Hizbullah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and Iranian forces in Syria. These concerns are no longer relevant. The second factor was operational capability - whether Israel could actually pull off such a strike. In April and October last year, Israeli Air Force jets flew 2,000 km. to strike Iranian targets, including Iran's Russian-made S-300 surface-to-air missile systems. These systems had been considered the primary deterrent to an Israeli airstrike, and their destruction made Iran's airspace wide open. The third factor was the change in Washington. We now know that President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu were coordinated and that comments coming out of Washington that a deal might still be possible were part of a planned ruse to put the Iranians to sleep. The writer, a senior fellow at the Jewish People Policy Institute, is a former editor-in-chief of the Jerusalem Post.2025-06-13 00:00:00Full Article
Israel Had a Window of Opportunity to Attack Iran and It Was Right to Use It
(Jerusalem Post) Yaakov Katz - Israel's strike on Iran's nuclear facilities took advantage of a unique window of opportunity. For years, when the issue of attacking Iran would come up, one of the main arguments against it was the retaliation Israel would face from Hizbullah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza, and Iranian forces in Syria. These concerns are no longer relevant. The second factor was operational capability - whether Israel could actually pull off such a strike. In April and October last year, Israeli Air Force jets flew 2,000 km. to strike Iranian targets, including Iran's Russian-made S-300 surface-to-air missile systems. These systems had been considered the primary deterrent to an Israeli airstrike, and their destruction made Iran's airspace wide open. The third factor was the change in Washington. We now know that President Trump and Prime Minister Netanyahu were coordinated and that comments coming out of Washington that a deal might still be possible were part of a planned ruse to put the Iranians to sleep. The writer, a senior fellow at the Jewish People Policy Institute, is a former editor-in-chief of the Jerusalem Post.2025-06-13 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|