Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs) Lt.-Col. (res.) Maurice Hirsch - According to the Laws of War and the Laws of the Sea, any vessel that attempts to breach a legally imposed maritime blockade becomes a legitimate military target. The country that imposed the blockade is thus entitled, and possibly even required, to use all necessary force to prevent the intended breach. So when climate activist Greta Thunberg and actor Liam Cunningham decided to board the latest terrorist-propaganda mission aboard the Madleen with the stated goal of breaking the maritime blockade imposed by Israel on Gaza, they and their fellows were knowingly taking their lives in their hands, and bear the sole responsibility for any outcome. In modern warfare, maritime blockades were explicitly mentioned in the 1856 Declaration of Paris Respecting Maritime Law, with more detailed requirements set out in the 1909 London Declaration on Naval Warfare. If the party that implemented the blockade has reasonable grounds to believe that a merchant vessel intends to breach the blockade, it may act to capture the vessel or even, if the vessel refuses to heed the warning and desist from an attempt to breach the blockade, attack the vessel. To act against a vessel that has the clear intention of breaching a blockade, the party that implemented the blockade does not have to wait until the blockade is actually breached. After Israel prevented the Mavi Marmara from attempting to breach the maritime blockade of Gaza in 2010, the UN Secretary-General appointed a Panel of Inquiry to examine the events. In its report, the Panel concluded "that Israel's naval blockade was legal." "There is no right...to breach a lawful blockade as a right of protest." Thunberg, Cunningham, and their friends are nothing more than useful idiots promoting the alleged right of the terrorists to "resist" (including by massacring women, children, and the elderly), undermining Israel's right to self-defense and the right to protect its citizens against genocidal terrorists. The writer, former director of the Military Prosecution in Judea and Samaria, is director of the Palestinian Authority Accountability Initiative at the Jerusalem Center. 2025-06-05 00:00:00Full Article
The Danger of Attempting to Breach a Maritime Blockade
(Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs) Lt.-Col. (res.) Maurice Hirsch - According to the Laws of War and the Laws of the Sea, any vessel that attempts to breach a legally imposed maritime blockade becomes a legitimate military target. The country that imposed the blockade is thus entitled, and possibly even required, to use all necessary force to prevent the intended breach. So when climate activist Greta Thunberg and actor Liam Cunningham decided to board the latest terrorist-propaganda mission aboard the Madleen with the stated goal of breaking the maritime blockade imposed by Israel on Gaza, they and their fellows were knowingly taking their lives in their hands, and bear the sole responsibility for any outcome. In modern warfare, maritime blockades were explicitly mentioned in the 1856 Declaration of Paris Respecting Maritime Law, with more detailed requirements set out in the 1909 London Declaration on Naval Warfare. If the party that implemented the blockade has reasonable grounds to believe that a merchant vessel intends to breach the blockade, it may act to capture the vessel or even, if the vessel refuses to heed the warning and desist from an attempt to breach the blockade, attack the vessel. To act against a vessel that has the clear intention of breaching a blockade, the party that implemented the blockade does not have to wait until the blockade is actually breached. After Israel prevented the Mavi Marmara from attempting to breach the maritime blockade of Gaza in 2010, the UN Secretary-General appointed a Panel of Inquiry to examine the events. In its report, the Panel concluded "that Israel's naval blockade was legal." "There is no right...to breach a lawful blockade as a right of protest." Thunberg, Cunningham, and their friends are nothing more than useful idiots promoting the alleged right of the terrorists to "resist" (including by massacring women, children, and the elderly), undermining Israel's right to self-defense and the right to protect its citizens against genocidal terrorists. The writer, former director of the Military Prosecution in Judea and Samaria, is director of the Palestinian Authority Accountability Initiative at the Jerusalem Center. 2025-06-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|