Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Gatestone Institute) Bassam Tawil - Next month, the UN is scheduled to host an international conference, co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, to advance the idea of a "two-state solution" between Israel and the Palestinians. Any talk about a "two-state solution" in the aftermath of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel is a sick joke. The "two-state solution" died on that day, when thousands of Hamas terrorists and "ordinary" Palestinians from Gaza invaded Israel, murdered 1,200 people, wounded thousands, and kidnapped another 251. In many respects, before Oct. 7, Gaza was an independent and sovereign Palestinian state controlled by Hamas. In 2005, Israel withdrew from Gaza and handed it over, unconditionally, to the Palestinian Authority. Less than two years later, Hamas staged a violent coup, toppling the PA and seizing control. The Israeli towns and villages near the border with Gaza that were invaded by the Palestinians were not "illegal settlements." The Israelis murdered and wounded on that day were not "illegal settlers." Rather, they were Israeli citizens residing within Israel's internationally recognized borders. But to many Palestinians, any Israeli is considered an appropriate target for murder, especially under the PA's lucrative "pay-for-slay" program. Ironically, many of the Israelis who were butchered and kidnapped on Oct. 7 were peace activists. They believed in the "two-state solution." Some even volunteered to drive sick Palestinians from Gaza to Israeli hospitals for treatment. But the Palestinians who invaded Israel on Oct. 7 did not care whether the Israelis they murdered supported a "two-state solution" or not. They did not even distinguish between Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs. 20 Israeli Arabs were murdered during the attacks or by Hamas rocket launches in the ensuing days. There were also 71 foreign victims on Oct. 7, mostly Thai workers. The Oct. 7 invasion should be seen as a declaration of war on Israel by the Hamas-controlled Palestinian state in Gaza. Twenty months later, Hamas is determined to fight to the last Palestinian. By pushing for a "two-state solution," these countries are sending a message to Palestinians that Oct. 7 was worthwhile. Can these countries or the UN guarantee that a Palestinian state in the West Bank would not be used in the future as a launching pad to attack Israel? Of course not.2025-05-29 00:00:00Full Article
A Palestinian State Would Be a Launching Pad to Attack Israel
(Gatestone Institute) Bassam Tawil - Next month, the UN is scheduled to host an international conference, co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, to advance the idea of a "two-state solution" between Israel and the Palestinians. Any talk about a "two-state solution" in the aftermath of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel is a sick joke. The "two-state solution" died on that day, when thousands of Hamas terrorists and "ordinary" Palestinians from Gaza invaded Israel, murdered 1,200 people, wounded thousands, and kidnapped another 251. In many respects, before Oct. 7, Gaza was an independent and sovereign Palestinian state controlled by Hamas. In 2005, Israel withdrew from Gaza and handed it over, unconditionally, to the Palestinian Authority. Less than two years later, Hamas staged a violent coup, toppling the PA and seizing control. The Israeli towns and villages near the border with Gaza that were invaded by the Palestinians were not "illegal settlements." The Israelis murdered and wounded on that day were not "illegal settlers." Rather, they were Israeli citizens residing within Israel's internationally recognized borders. But to many Palestinians, any Israeli is considered an appropriate target for murder, especially under the PA's lucrative "pay-for-slay" program. Ironically, many of the Israelis who were butchered and kidnapped on Oct. 7 were peace activists. They believed in the "two-state solution." Some even volunteered to drive sick Palestinians from Gaza to Israeli hospitals for treatment. But the Palestinians who invaded Israel on Oct. 7 did not care whether the Israelis they murdered supported a "two-state solution" or not. They did not even distinguish between Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs. 20 Israeli Arabs were murdered during the attacks or by Hamas rocket launches in the ensuing days. There were also 71 foreign victims on Oct. 7, mostly Thai workers. The Oct. 7 invasion should be seen as a declaration of war on Israel by the Hamas-controlled Palestinian state in Gaza. Twenty months later, Hamas is determined to fight to the last Palestinian. By pushing for a "two-state solution," these countries are sending a message to Palestinians that Oct. 7 was worthwhile. Can these countries or the UN guarantee that a Palestinian state in the West Bank would not be used in the future as a launching pad to attack Israel? Of course not.2025-05-29 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|