Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Matthew Levitt - The debate around the Trump administration's current negotiations with Iran focuses on curtailing or terminating Iranian uranium enrichment. But Iran's sponsorship of terrorism should be central to the talks as well. After President Trump signed a National Security Presidential Memorandum in February reinstating "maximum pressure" on Iran, a White House fact sheet stated that the goal included not only denying Iran "all paths to a nuclear weapon," but also "countering Iran's malign influence abroad." Iranian support for terrorism was also a central component of Trump's decision in 2018 to pull out of the Obama deal - the JCPOA. As long as any new deal is limited to the nuclear portfolio and does not cover Iran's other illicit activities, some sanctions will remain in place. There is a wide array of international sanctions on Iran which are intended to punish it for its support of terrorism, human rights abuses, and other issues. Iran cannot enjoy the economic benefits it seeks while under sanction, and some sanctions will remain in place so long as Iran continues to engage in these illicit activities. The only way to square this circle is to expand negotiations to include not just nuclear weapons but Iranian sponsorship of terrorism as well. The writer is director of the Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute. 2025-04-29 00:00:00Full Article
Negotiations with Iran Must Address Iranian Sponsorship of Terrorism
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Matthew Levitt - The debate around the Trump administration's current negotiations with Iran focuses on curtailing or terminating Iranian uranium enrichment. But Iran's sponsorship of terrorism should be central to the talks as well. After President Trump signed a National Security Presidential Memorandum in February reinstating "maximum pressure" on Iran, a White House fact sheet stated that the goal included not only denying Iran "all paths to a nuclear weapon," but also "countering Iran's malign influence abroad." Iranian support for terrorism was also a central component of Trump's decision in 2018 to pull out of the Obama deal - the JCPOA. As long as any new deal is limited to the nuclear portfolio and does not cover Iran's other illicit activities, some sanctions will remain in place. There is a wide array of international sanctions on Iran which are intended to punish it for its support of terrorism, human rights abuses, and other issues. Iran cannot enjoy the economic benefits it seeks while under sanction, and some sanctions will remain in place so long as Iran continues to engage in these illicit activities. The only way to square this circle is to expand negotiations to include not just nuclear weapons but Iranian sponsorship of terrorism as well. The writer is director of the Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence at The Washington Institute. 2025-04-29 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|