Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(U.S. State Department) Secretary of State Marco Rubio - Secretary of State Marco Rubio discussed U.S.-Iran negotiations in an interview with Bari Weiss on Tuesday: "The previous deal was bad for a number of reasons. It gave Iran immediate and full sanctions relief in exchange for enrichment capabilities that at any point could be weaponized in the future....We gave them permanent concessions for temporary concessions on their part." "If Iran wants a civil nuclear program, they can have one just like many other countries in the world have one, and that is they import enriched material....There's a pathway to a civil, peaceful nuclear program if they want one. But if they insist on enriching, then they will be the only country in the world that doesn't have a 'weapons program' but is enriching. And so I think that's problematic." Q: U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff gave an interview in which he said that the goal should be to ensure that Iran's uranium enrichment would be capped at 3.5% for civilian use and verified. Rubio: "Steve subsequently followed up by clarifying that what he meant is that that would be the limit of what they would be allowed to import for their domestic program...like multiple countries around the world do for their peaceful civil nuclear programs....And they do that now. They do have a nuclear reactor that imports Russian enriched material at 3.67, and that's what you need for - but they don't enrich it themselves." 2025-04-24 00:00:00Full Article
Iran's Insistence on Enriching Uranium Is Problematic
(U.S. State Department) Secretary of State Marco Rubio - Secretary of State Marco Rubio discussed U.S.-Iran negotiations in an interview with Bari Weiss on Tuesday: "The previous deal was bad for a number of reasons. It gave Iran immediate and full sanctions relief in exchange for enrichment capabilities that at any point could be weaponized in the future....We gave them permanent concessions for temporary concessions on their part." "If Iran wants a civil nuclear program, they can have one just like many other countries in the world have one, and that is they import enriched material....There's a pathway to a civil, peaceful nuclear program if they want one. But if they insist on enriching, then they will be the only country in the world that doesn't have a 'weapons program' but is enriching. And so I think that's problematic." Q: U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff gave an interview in which he said that the goal should be to ensure that Iran's uranium enrichment would be capped at 3.5% for civilian use and verified. Rubio: "Steve subsequently followed up by clarifying that what he meant is that that would be the limit of what they would be allowed to import for their domestic program...like multiple countries around the world do for their peaceful civil nuclear programs....And they do that now. They do have a nuclear reactor that imports Russian enriched material at 3.67, and that's what you need for - but they don't enrich it themselves." 2025-04-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|