Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Gatestone Institute) Dr. Majid Rafizadeh - The Trump administration is engaging with the Iranian regime to prevent Iran from an imminent nuclear weapons breakout. Iran's acceptance of talks is a tactic. Cornered by growing U.S. and Israeli threats, the mullahs seem to be seeking to buy time and ease the pressure. Tehran only negotiates when it is desperate. Tehran understands full well that refusing to talk could invite devastating consequences. That is why the regime is willing to engage. Tehran's hold over the region has been weakening. Internally, the economy is near collapse. Under these conditions, who would refuse to talk, especially when the alternative is an Israeli-American air campaign targeting its nuclear facilities. Tehran has played this game before: Agree to talks. Make vague promises. Extract sanctions relief. Then quietly continue nuclear development under the radar. This formula has worked for more than two decades. The only reason Iran is talking is to stall, to promise just enough to prevent America from striking it and seeing its uranium centrifuges and enrichment sites blasted to rubble. But the regime cannot accept total nuclear disarmament. It is naive, even dangerous, to believe that Iran will dismantle its nuclear program. This is a regime that has spent decades investing billions of dollars, building secret facilities and deceiving international inspectors. Since the early 2000s, when Iran's clandestine program was first exposed, U.S. presidents have tried every approach imaginable. None of these efforts worked. The Islamic Republic has smoothly outmaneuvered every administration. It has accepted deals to avoid confrontation, then quietly violated them. With each round of negotiations, Iran gained time, money, legitimacy - and gave away nothing it could not reverse. Further talks will only serve Iran's interests. The Islamic Republic has demonstrated that it cannot be trusted to negotiate in good faith. Hoping for a different outcome is self-deceptive make-believe. 2025-04-15 00:00:00Full Article
Iran's Mullahs Will Not Abandon Their Nuclear Program
(Gatestone Institute) Dr. Majid Rafizadeh - The Trump administration is engaging with the Iranian regime to prevent Iran from an imminent nuclear weapons breakout. Iran's acceptance of talks is a tactic. Cornered by growing U.S. and Israeli threats, the mullahs seem to be seeking to buy time and ease the pressure. Tehran only negotiates when it is desperate. Tehran understands full well that refusing to talk could invite devastating consequences. That is why the regime is willing to engage. Tehran's hold over the region has been weakening. Internally, the economy is near collapse. Under these conditions, who would refuse to talk, especially when the alternative is an Israeli-American air campaign targeting its nuclear facilities. Tehran has played this game before: Agree to talks. Make vague promises. Extract sanctions relief. Then quietly continue nuclear development under the radar. This formula has worked for more than two decades. The only reason Iran is talking is to stall, to promise just enough to prevent America from striking it and seeing its uranium centrifuges and enrichment sites blasted to rubble. But the regime cannot accept total nuclear disarmament. It is naive, even dangerous, to believe that Iran will dismantle its nuclear program. This is a regime that has spent decades investing billions of dollars, building secret facilities and deceiving international inspectors. Since the early 2000s, when Iran's clandestine program was first exposed, U.S. presidents have tried every approach imaginable. None of these efforts worked. The Islamic Republic has smoothly outmaneuvered every administration. It has accepted deals to avoid confrontation, then quietly violated them. With each round of negotiations, Iran gained time, money, legitimacy - and gave away nothing it could not reverse. Further talks will only serve Iran's interests. The Islamic Republic has demonstrated that it cannot be trusted to negotiate in good faith. Hoping for a different outcome is self-deceptive make-believe. 2025-04-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|