Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Substack) Maj. (ret.) Andrew Fox - A Dec. 18 report in Ha'aretz about the conduct of the IDF in the Netzarim corridor in Gaza claimed to "Expose Arbitrary Killings and Rampant Lawlessness" by Israeli soldiers. In late November 2024, I went to the Netzarim Corridor with the IDF. I saw nothing in the behavior, conversation or ethos in the many soldiers I spoke to there that resembled the accounts described in Ha'aretz. The soldiers I spoke to were all reservists from the unit that was the focus of Ha'aretz's hit piece. The IDF's ethos and rules of engagement are always referenced early and often in every conversation with IDF front-line officers. It is very important to them to carry out their operations legally. As a former soldier, I know that war is bloody and brutal. The blood and brutality are constrained by the law of armed conflict, but ultimately a soldier's job is to carry out the mission within those parameters. And the mission for the IDF, after Oct. 7, is to conduct a war of national self-defense so that Oct. 7 can never happen again. The ethos I have observed is the ethos I would expect. We were amused that the soldiers were not expecting us: I have seen British Army stage-managed media visits, and this was not like that. The troops we interviewed were eloquent, compassionate and thoughtful. Not a word of hatred was expressed for anyone but Hamas. Nothing I had seen or heard in the Netzarim Corridor tallied with what I read in Ha'aretz. The phrasing and unbalanced portrayal of the IDF in Gaza make the article shameless manipulation masquerading as fair reporting, in pursuit of Ha'aretz's well-established political position. The writer, who served in the British Army from 2005-21, is a research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society and a lecturer at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. 2025-01-12 00:00:00Full Article
Ha'aretz Article on IDF in Gaza Is Shameless Manipulation Masquerading as Fair Reporting
(Substack) Maj. (ret.) Andrew Fox - A Dec. 18 report in Ha'aretz about the conduct of the IDF in the Netzarim corridor in Gaza claimed to "Expose Arbitrary Killings and Rampant Lawlessness" by Israeli soldiers. In late November 2024, I went to the Netzarim Corridor with the IDF. I saw nothing in the behavior, conversation or ethos in the many soldiers I spoke to there that resembled the accounts described in Ha'aretz. The soldiers I spoke to were all reservists from the unit that was the focus of Ha'aretz's hit piece. The IDF's ethos and rules of engagement are always referenced early and often in every conversation with IDF front-line officers. It is very important to them to carry out their operations legally. As a former soldier, I know that war is bloody and brutal. The blood and brutality are constrained by the law of armed conflict, but ultimately a soldier's job is to carry out the mission within those parameters. And the mission for the IDF, after Oct. 7, is to conduct a war of national self-defense so that Oct. 7 can never happen again. The ethos I have observed is the ethos I would expect. We were amused that the soldiers were not expecting us: I have seen British Army stage-managed media visits, and this was not like that. The troops we interviewed were eloquent, compassionate and thoughtful. Not a word of hatred was expressed for anyone but Hamas. Nothing I had seen or heard in the Netzarim Corridor tallied with what I read in Ha'aretz. The phrasing and unbalanced portrayal of the IDF in Gaza make the article shameless manipulation masquerading as fair reporting, in pursuit of Ha'aretz's well-established political position. The writer, who served in the British Army from 2005-21, is a research fellow at the Henry Jackson Society and a lecturer at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst. 2025-01-12 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|