Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Allen Z. Hertz - The doctrine of proportionality does not require some sort of a balance between Israeli and Hamas dead. International law does not require the Israeli government to sit back and accept the firing of rockets at Israel civilians and soldiers, just because measures to prevent that firing would likely result in some collateral civilian injury. The Israeli government has to opt for some Hamas deaths (civilian and military) from Israeli preventive measures to prevent some Israeli deaths (civilian and military) resulting from Hamas missiles hitting Israel. Any other decision would irrationally privilege the lives of Arabs in Gaza over those of civilians and soldiers in Israel. A state has a moral and legal right to use force in self-defense, even though that recourse to force is likely to cause some collateral civilian injury and death. With respect to Gaza, the Israeli government acts not by way of retaliation or punishment, but for prevention, to stop the launching of Hamas missiles and thus prevent more Israeli civilians and soldiers from being killed. The writer was senior adviser in the Privy Council Office serving Canada's prime minister and the federal cabinet. 2012-12-20 00:00:00Full Article
Proportionality and Self-Defense
(Jerusalem Post) Allen Z. Hertz - The doctrine of proportionality does not require some sort of a balance between Israeli and Hamas dead. International law does not require the Israeli government to sit back and accept the firing of rockets at Israel civilians and soldiers, just because measures to prevent that firing would likely result in some collateral civilian injury. The Israeli government has to opt for some Hamas deaths (civilian and military) from Israeli preventive measures to prevent some Israeli deaths (civilian and military) resulting from Hamas missiles hitting Israel. Any other decision would irrationally privilege the lives of Arabs in Gaza over those of civilians and soldiers in Israel. A state has a moral and legal right to use force in self-defense, even though that recourse to force is likely to cause some collateral civilian injury and death. With respect to Gaza, the Israeli government acts not by way of retaliation or punishment, but for prevention, to stop the launching of Hamas missiles and thus prevent more Israeli civilians and soldiers from being killed. The writer was senior adviser in the Privy Council Office serving Canada's prime minister and the federal cabinet. 2012-12-20 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|