Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Christian Science Monitor] John Hughes - Think if a renegade group had a base in New Jersey and could hit Manhattan with 100 rockets a day nonstop for three months. Or a similar group across the Potomac could do the same to downtown Washington. Hizballah is the provocateur that launched this war. The ideal shape of a solution beyond a cease-fire is in the language of UN Resolution 1559 that requires that Hizballah be disarmed. International diplomats seem to be leaning toward some multinational force, but what will be their mission? If it is simply to attempt to keep the peace in a region where there is no peace, then the mission is pointless. If it is to fulfill UN Resolution 1559 requiring the disarming of Hizballah, are they to do it themselves, or in concert with Lebanon's own rather ineffective army? What degree of force will be needed? And what will be the stance of Syria and Iran, Hizballah's mentors? Will they stand idly by on the sidelines? 2006-08-03 01:00:00Full Article
Disarming Hizballah Is Key to Lebanon's Peace
[Christian Science Monitor] John Hughes - Think if a renegade group had a base in New Jersey and could hit Manhattan with 100 rockets a day nonstop for three months. Or a similar group across the Potomac could do the same to downtown Washington. Hizballah is the provocateur that launched this war. The ideal shape of a solution beyond a cease-fire is in the language of UN Resolution 1559 that requires that Hizballah be disarmed. International diplomats seem to be leaning toward some multinational force, but what will be their mission? If it is simply to attempt to keep the peace in a region where there is no peace, then the mission is pointless. If it is to fulfill UN Resolution 1559 requiring the disarming of Hizballah, are they to do it themselves, or in concert with Lebanon's own rather ineffective army? What degree of force will be needed? And what will be the stance of Syria and Iran, Hizballah's mentors? Will they stand idly by on the sidelines? 2006-08-03 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|