Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Wall Street Journal] Gerald F. Seib - The most delicate question is whether there is a way for the Obama administration to open a conversation with Iran's government without also discouraging or undercutting the opposition, which has demonstrated that there is broad dissatisfaction - even disgust - with that government. "It's possible with a great deal of nuance," says Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. If the talks happen not directly but within a broader conversation organized by the group of world powers, he says, "I think there is a way those discussions can be had without pouring water on the opposition or sending the signal to the millions in the streets that the U.S. is trying to cut a deal with the government." But, Sadjadpour adds, talking directly with the now-iron-fisted Mr. Ahmadinejad would be "poisonous." 2009-08-28 08:00:00Full Article
Iran Upheaval Complicates U.S. Moves
[Wall Street Journal] Gerald F. Seib - The most delicate question is whether there is a way for the Obama administration to open a conversation with Iran's government without also discouraging or undercutting the opposition, which has demonstrated that there is broad dissatisfaction - even disgust - with that government. "It's possible with a great deal of nuance," says Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran analyst at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. If the talks happen not directly but within a broader conversation organized by the group of world powers, he says, "I think there is a way those discussions can be had without pouring water on the opposition or sending the signal to the millions in the streets that the U.S. is trying to cut a deal with the government." But, Sadjadpour adds, talking directly with the now-iron-fisted Mr. Ahmadinejad would be "poisonous." 2009-08-28 08:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|