Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[National Post-Canada] Barry Kay - At any time through 1967, the Arabs then in complete control of the West Bank and Gaza could have declared a state, as not one Jewish settlement existed on their land, but refused to do so. All Arabs then, and for many years afterward, refused to accept the legitimacy of any Jewish state, the position Hamas maintains to this day. The Israeli-Palestinian dispute is not a conflict between good and evil, but rather between two peoples, each of which is entitled to a homeland. That one is immeasurably stronger than the other makes it neither right nor wrong. The intransigence of Palestinian leaders suggests they are masochistic in preferring to perpetuate their people's suffering rather than to reach a compromise. The writer is a political science professor at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo, Ontario. 2009-08-28 08:00:00Full Article
Palestinian Leaders' Intransigence Perpetuates Their People's Suffering
[National Post-Canada] Barry Kay - At any time through 1967, the Arabs then in complete control of the West Bank and Gaza could have declared a state, as not one Jewish settlement existed on their land, but refused to do so. All Arabs then, and for many years afterward, refused to accept the legitimacy of any Jewish state, the position Hamas maintains to this day. The Israeli-Palestinian dispute is not a conflict between good and evil, but rather between two peoples, each of which is entitled to a homeland. That one is immeasurably stronger than the other makes it neither right nor wrong. The intransigence of Palestinian leaders suggests they are masochistic in preferring to perpetuate their people's suffering rather than to reach a compromise. The writer is a political science professor at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo, Ontario. 2009-08-28 08:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|