Israel's Sovereignty over the Golan Heights Is Legal and Justified

(Commentary) Vivian Bercovici - An Israeli declaration of sovereignty over the Golan Heights, and American recognition of it, is not contrary to international law. Since World War II, the accepted understanding of international law that involves territorial loss during conflict is quite straightforward: the attacking nation may not retain permanently land acquired as a result of armed conflict. We have heard a lot about how the Russian occupation of Crimea is indistinct from Israel's hold over the Golan. But Russia invaded Crimea; Crimea did not invade Russia. Syria attacked Israel in 1967; Israel did not attack Syria. International law only addresses the situation where the attacker, not the defender, conquers. Syria violated international law in 1967 and 1973 by attacking Israel without provocation. The writer served as Canada's ambassador to Israel from 2014 to 2016.


2019-03-28 00:00:00

Full Article

BACK

Visit the Daily Alert Archive