DAILY ALERT
Thursday,
September 25, 2025
In-Depth Issues:

Iran Begins Rebuilding Missile Sites, but a Key Component Is Missing - Jon Gambrell (AP)
    Iran has begun rebuilding missile-production sites targeted by Israel during its 12-day war in June, satellite images show, but a key component is likely still missing - the large planetary mixers needed to produce solid fuel for the weapons.
    Iran could purchase them from China.



UK Decision to Recognize Palestinian State Could Lead to UK Paying 2 Trillion Pounds in Reparations - Gabriel Millard-Clothier (Daily Mail-UK)
    Britain's decision to recognize a state of Palestine could lead to demands for the UK to pay more than 2 trillion pounds in reparations to the country, legal experts have said.
    Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas is demanding "reparations in accordance with international law" for land "taken from the Palestinian people" when Britain relinquished control of the region, based on the value of the land which was under British rule between 1917 and 1948.
    Some international law experts have described 2 trillion pounds, roughly the size of Britain's total economy, as a "good place to start."



At UN, Indonesian President Says Guaranteeing Israel's Security Is Key to Peace (Times of Israel)
    Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto told the UN General Assembly on Tuesday, "We must also recognize, we must also respect, and we must also guarantee the safety and security of Israel. Only then we can have real peace."
    Indonesia is the world's most populous Muslim country and does not have relations with Israel.



Why Arab States, Palestinian Authority Will Not Run Gaza's "Day-After" - Prof. Hillel Frisch (Jerusalem Post)
    Commentators raise the possibility that Gaza, "the day after," will be run by the Palestinian Authority (PA) with the support of the moderate countries - Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.
    The crucial role of these countries stems from the PA's weakness. Since the PA will not be able to deal with Hamas and Islamic Jihad in Gaza, only the crucial policing role of moderate Arab countries can render PA rule in Gaza viable.
    The problem is that a close reading of the statements of these states proves that they are not prepared to play that role in Gaza.
    At a conference of the Arab League that convened in Cairo this past March, Jordan and Egypt were content to train PA police forces to ensure security in Gaza. There is not a single word about the willingness of these countries to contribute their own forces toward ensuring security in Gaza.
    On the contrary, the league member states emphasize that security "is an exclusive Palestinian responsibility to be managed by the legitimate Palestinian institutions."
    A Joint Declaration on Developments in Gaza published in August by Arab and non-Arab Muslim countries once again included no commitment on the part of the signatory countries to provide internal security in Gaza.
    Gaza must not be viewed through rose-colored glasses. No one will eradicate Hamas for us.
    The writer is professor emeritus at Bar-Ilan University and a senior researcher at the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security.



Israel Is Decimating Hamas Infrastructure Using Explosive-Laden Unmanned Armored Vehicles (X)
    Army Radio military correspondent Doron Kadosh reveals how Israel is decimating Hamas infrastructure using explosive-laden unmanned armored vehicles to obliterate terror strongholds while dramatically reducing danger to troops.
    Each robotic strike delivers the force of two Air Force bombs, precisely targeting booby-trapped buildings and neutralizing IEDs.
    Deployed dozens of times daily, the APCs drop their explosive payloads, retreat to safety, and detonate remotely, making them reusable instead of expendable.


Follow the Jerusalem Center on:


The Palestinian Nuclear Option - Irwin J. Mansdorf, Ph.D. (Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs)
    The past two years of war have been a lesson in psychological asymmetry, the phenomenon whereby a strong military force "loses" a psychological battle to a weaker force.
    The Western world has fallen victim to the psychological ammunition of a people who have used victimhood psychologically and terror militarily.
    Victimhood is the psychological equivalent of a nuclear weapon. It utterly changes the perceptual landscape and casts fallout that spreads well beyond the borders of the conflict itself.
    It erases any weakness or guilt associated with behavior that would otherwise be considered horrific.
    Victimhood allows an aggressor the freedom to be absolved of any accusation that they, in fact, are responsible for the consequences of their behavior.
    While victimhood may create a psychologically weaker Israel in the West, its effect in the Middle East may be the polar opposite. Here, power, not victimhood, is respected, and Israel is seen as a force to be reckoned with.
    Clear victories in Lebanon and Iran have cast a shadow of grudging respect borne of fear across the entire region.
    In an area where Israel can strike thousands of kilometers from home, there is no appetite to be the next victim.
    The writer is a clinical psychologist and a fellow at the Jerusalem Center specializing in political psychology.



"Kill the Jews!": The Cry Went Out across the World - Howard Jacobson (Telegraph-UK)
    The antisemitism of today is purposive, orchestrated hate, combining Islamic hostility to the very idea of a Jewish state on Arab land; Christian anti-Judaism that goes back two thousand years; and professorial obsession with settler-colonialism, a made-up academic discipline that denominates Zionism as an ideology of conquest, no matter that the first Zionists were returning to their historic homeland as refugees from the pogroms of Eastern Europe.
    As for the argument that you can hate Zionism and not hate Jews, that was blown apart in the first weeks of October 2023 when all such distinctions were dropped in the carnival excitement of the butchering and raping of Jews wherever they came from and whatever they believed.
  "Kill the Jews!," the cry went out across the world. Not just Zionists and Israelis, but all Jews.



Bennett: Recognition of a Palestinian State Will Only Breed More Terrorism (Jerusalem Post)
    Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett said Sunday on X: "We tried a Palestinian state before and it became a full-blown terror state. From their terrorist state in Gaza, they launched a horrible massacre and slaughtered 1,163 civilians."
    He cited the example of "radicalized Muslim minorities" in France. "They've already said their goal is to kill Christian infidels. They've already launched terror attacks all across Europe. We've learned this the hard way, will you? Palestine today means Paris tomorrow."



As Long as the Existence of Israel Is Seen as an Insult, There Can Be No Peace - Jake Wallis Simons (Telegraph-UK)
    Israelis have been through all this before. They tried peace in the nineties with the Oslo Accords and got 140 suicide bombers.
    They tried it when Ariel Sharon withdrew from Gaza in 2005 and handed the Palestinians the keys. The reward for that was the massacre on Oct. 7.
    The Abbas government in the Palestinian Authority has long given generous handouts to any Palestinian convicted of terrorism. Its schools and state media are infested with antisemitic incitement.
    Yet while Benjamin Netanyahu would be arrested for setting foot in Britain, Abbas is treated to tea with our prime minister. For shame.
    The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not about borders. It is about honor. For centuries, Muslim empires ruled up to 100 million people, with Jews living as second-class citizens. This created natural confidence in the supremacy of Islam.
    However, with the collapse of the Ottoman Empire in 1922, the cultural and religious trauma ran deep. When Hitler arose, historians record that much of the Islamic world rushed into alliances with him, seeing the Third Reich as a vehicle for reclaiming dominion over the West. But Nazi Germany became the vanquished.
    When the weakling Jews returned to their ancient home, here was the ultimate dishonor. As long as the existence of Israel is seen as an insult, millions will never be satisfied until a Palestinian state replaces it.
    That is a truth in need of international recognition.


Search the Recent History of Israel and the Middle East

Send the Daily Alert to a Friend
    If you are viewing the email version of the Daily Alert and want to share it with friends, please click Forward in your email program and enter their address.


News Resources - North America, Europe, and Asia:
  • Italy and Spain Send Navy Ships to Defend Greta Thunberg's Gaza Flotilla - Samer Al-Atrush
    Italy and Spain have sent navy ships to assist a flotilla of pro-Palestinian activists including Greta Thunberg, the Swedish campaigner, after the vessels were attacked overnight by drones. The Global Sumud flotilla blamed Israel for the attacks and said the drones caused 13 explosions as they targeted the sails of at least 11 of the vessels, although no one was injured. An Italian MP on board one vessel also said ship radios were jammed and suddenly started playing Abba songs at top volume.
        Israel has prevented seaborne activists from reaching Gaza twice this year, including Thunberg. Israel says the flotilla activists are complicit with Hamas. On Wednesday Israel said it had told the activists it would take delivery of the aid from them and deliver it to Gaza.
        "We were sorry to hear the response from the Hamas flotilla representative that the flotilla insists on pursuing a violent course of action and refuses our proposal to transfer, in a coordinated and peaceful manner, any aid that might be aboard," the Israel Foreign Ministry said. "If the flotilla continues to reject Israel's peaceful proposal, Israel will take the necessary measures to prevent its entry into the combat zone and to stop any violation of a lawful naval blockade."
        Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni condemned the attack while claiming the flotilla was a "dangerous and irresponsible" political stunt. She alleged that the Italian opposition MPs on board were intent on "creating problems" for her government, which has declined to recognize Palestinian statehood. (The Times-UK)
  • President Trump Denounces European Recognition of Palestinian State as "Reward" for Hamas - Morgan Phillips
    Speaking at the UN General Assembly on Tuesday, President Donald Trump sharply criticized a wave of European nations that recently recognized a Palestinian state. "Unfortunately, Hamas has repeatedly rejected reasonable offers to make peace. We can't forget Oct. 7, can we? Now, as if to encourage continued conflict, some of this body is seeking to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state...this would be a reward for these horrible atrocities, including Oct. 7."
        "This could have been solved so long ago. Instead of giving in to Hamas's ransom demands, those who want peace should be united with one message: release the hostages now."  (Fox News)
        See also Transcript: Trump at the UN (Foreign Policy)
  • U.S. to UN: "There Is No Credible Palestinian Partner for Peace"
    U.S. UN Ambassador Mike Waltz told the Security Council on Tuesday: "Unilateral recognition statements do not alter the reality on the ground - it does not alter the fact that there is not a Palestinian state to recognize. And at this point there is no credible Palestinian partner for peace. The Palestinian Authority leaders from Ramallah are absent from New York this week because they failed to meet their Oslo commitments."
        "The commitments were basic, including renouncing terrorism, renouncing violence, resolving issues through direct negotiations with Israel. The Palestinian Authority has failed to clear even these low bars. And their attempts to bypass negotiations through what can only be called lawfare, including at the ICC and at the ICJ, and its pushes for unilateral recognition of statehood."  (U.S. Mission to the UN)
News Resources - Israel and the Mideast:
  • Houthi Drone Strikes Eilat, 48 Wounded - Gadi Zaig
    A Houthi drone crashed next to a hotel in Eilat on Wednesday, wounding 48 people, two of them seriously. (Jerusalem Post)
  • Hamas Fires on IDF Troops from Gaza Hospital - Yoav Zitun
    The IDF on Wednesday released footage showing Hamas terrorists opening heavy fire against Israeli forces from the Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. (Ynet News)
  • New Anti-Hamas Enclave Emerges in Southern Gaza - Nurit Yohanan
    In Kizan al-Najjar, a depopulated village near Khan Yunis, Hossam al-Astal, 50, a former Palestinian Authority officer, recently announced the formation of a militia called Strike Force Against Terror and is inviting displaced Gazans to live under his protection. He offers food, water, shelter, and freedom from Hamas.
        "Dozens of families contact me every day," he said in an interview. His enclave is the latest iteration of a potentially significant phenomenon taking hold in areas of Gaza under Israeli control: the emergence of clan-based militias filling the vacuum left by Hamas's retreat. (Times of Israel)
Global Commentary and Think-Tank Analysis:

    The Gaza War

  • Hamas Are Being Smashed in Gaza City - Col. (ret.) Richard Kemp
    The Israeli offensive engulfing Gaza City has hurled Hamas into panic mode. The IDF is conducting the most intensive operations of this two-year campaign, building intensity by the day. Military facilities including fighting positions, command centers and observation posts located in civilian buildings, including tower blocks, have been struck and destroyed.
        In line with their obligations under the laws of war, the IDF have repeatedly dropped leaflets warning Gazan civilians to leave the city and opened up corridors to allow them to move safely to the south. Current estimates suggest around 550,000 have departed so far and more are on the way out.
        Already reeling from the assault on their sponsors in Iran, Hamas had been hoping for at least a pause in hostilities with the latest stalling tactics from their negotiating team in Qatar. But that evaporated with the IDF strike on Doha which demonstrated that the Hamas leadership were safe nowhere.
        So, at Hamas's moment of maximum stress, British Prime Minister Starmer rides to their rescue with his formal recognition of a non-existent Palestinian state, a move that their leaders characterize as "victory." Hamas are obviously not interested in a two-state solution, any more than their fellow jihadists in the PLO and Palestinian Authority are: they want only the annihilation of the Jewish state.
        Israel's erstwhile allies have now shot their bolt. Recognition was their doomsday weapon. By publicly rewarding the butchers of Oct. 7, they have denied themselves even the small amount of influence they might have had over the progress of this war or the future of the Middle East.
        Paradoxically, the appeasement of global jihadists by opposing Jerusalem's defensive war in Gaza will make Britain even more dependent on Israel. Weakness of this type only ever provokes further violence and the threat to the UK will consequently increase. I know from my own experience how much Israel has assisted Britain and many other countries in combating terrorism and the need for that will now be even greater.
        The writer, a former commander of British forces in Afghanistan, was chairman of the UK's national crisis management committee, COBRA.  (Telegraph-UK)
  • Why Israel Cannot Reach a Deal with Hamas - Prof. Eyal Zisser
    Hamas as a conventional army, with an offensive force capable of surprising Israel and striking it, has not existed for some time. Yet even after capturing Gaza City, that will not be enough to end the struggle with Hamas. There will always be some cleric who continues to preach jihad against Israel and there will always be a lone attacker or a terror cell in Gaza or even in the West Bank that seeks to carry out an act of terror.
        We assume it is possible to reach understandings with Hamas or even an agreement that will bring this war to an end, secure the release of our hostages, and dismantle the organization's armaments. However, as Ahmed Yassin, the organization's founder, explained: "We, unlike the Israelis, love death more than life." If that is the message, then death is a worthy and desirable price on the altar of jihad. If that is the way of thinking, exactly what kind of agreement can be reached with Hamas?
        The expectation that Hamas can be brought to raise a white flag is not realistic and cannot be relied upon. ISIS was defeated in Syria, but it did not raise a white flag. Hizbullah, too, was struck a heavy blow but did not raise a white flag and is waiting for an opportune moment to renew its terror activity.
        The writer is a lecturer in the Middle East History Department at Tel Aviv University.  (Israel Hayom)
  • Why Israel Must Destroy Hamas in Gaza City - Prof. Efraim Inbar
    The international consensus for ending Hamas rule in Gaza and for its disarmament cannot be achieved without the use of military force. Therefore, the conquest of Gaza City is imperative for removing Hamas from power and for Israel being perceived as the victor in the war. This war is not a boxing match where winning by points is possible. In Gaza - where the victory will be determined - a knockout is a must. Without the eviction of Hamas - an unequivocal victory - Israel lost the war.
        The operations in an urban setting, the unprecedented scale of subterranean warfare, and the ceasefires imposed on Israel to free the hostages prolonged the war. Similarly, the Biden administration's interference in the conduct of the war and its arms boycotts extended the war. The length of the war allows Hamas to claim victory because it survived for almost two years in the contest with Israel.
        There is no "day after" if Hamas units are allowed to stay in Gaza. Who will come to maintain law and order, risking Hamas terrorism? At the same time, all the states that have peace treaties with Israel - Egypt, Jordan, the Emirates, Bahrain, and Morocco - abhor Hamas, an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.
        The writer is head of the Program for Strategy, Diplomacy and Security at the Shalem Academic Center.  (Jerusalem Post)
  • The Israel Border Police Undercover Unit Fighting Gaza's Shadow War - Shosh Mula
    Israel's Border Police have been operating an undercover unit inside Gaza. Disguised, they hunt snipers who had fired on IDF troops. Deputy Commander D., the unit's operations officer, explains: "We bring our unique advantage - the ability to operate in small, flexible teams. Each team includes specialists: snipers, breachers, climbers trained for urban combat, and more. We can reach a point beyond enemy lines without raising suspicion, blend into hostile populations to gather intelligence, and handle riots or demonstrations without being exposed."
        When Hamas fighters embed among civilians, "a regular military force can't act without risking civilian lives. But we can infiltrate, identify the target, neutralize it quietly, and leave without being discovered....If the IDF operates only up to a certain line, we go further in, ahead of them, without being exposed, and help them carry out their mission safely."
        "We always think outside the box, how not to be seen when we arrive, how not to be identified while we operate, how to blend into the terrain or into the heart of a hostile camp. The army faces many challenges and needs a unit that can carry out quiet operations that leave no trace. We work without leaving footprints."
        The unit has been sent to neutralize terrorists who were firing at civilians collecting food at an aid center. In one mission, they discovered Hamas snipers disguised as civilians moving toward IDF positions. "We tracked them, identified weapons hidden on their backs, and eliminated them. All this happened while nearby IDF forces had no idea what was going on."  (Ynet News)


  • The Gaza Flotilla

  • Does Israel Have the Legal Right to Intercept the New Gaza Flotilla? - Jeremy Sharon
    Is Israel entitled to intercept the latest Gaza flotilla? Israel officially declared a naval blockade on Gaza in 2009 as part of an effort to restrict Hamas's ability to smuggle in weapons and war materiel, and has enforced the blockade ever since.
        Naval blockades are a very common military practice. They are permitted under the San Remo Manual on naval warfare, a widely accepted codification of the laws of naval warfare, as well as under the London Declaration of 1909. A report issued by a panel of inquiry into the Mavi Marmara incident established by the UN Secretary General in September 2011 determined that Israel's blockade on Gaza was legal and "a legitimate exercise of the right of self-defense."
        Moreover, the amount of aid being brought by the flotilla represents a tiny fraction of the amount of aid currently being delivered through Israel's border crossings with Gaza every week. Between Sep. 14 and Sep. 19, 2025, 736 humanitarian aid trucks entered Gaza bearing 14,125 tons of aid, 86% of which was food.
        The San Remo Manual states explicitly that merchant vessels "believed on reasonable grounds to be breaching a blockade" may be captured, and that such vessels resisting capture can even be attacked after being warned. Since it is the explicit aim of the current flotilla to breach Israel's naval blockade, it would appear that Israel is within its rights to intercept it.
        Capturing ships that openly declare their intention to break the blockade can be done on the high seas, meaning outside of territorial waters, and is permitted under international law, said Dr. Eran Shamir-Borer, former head of the International Law Department of the IDF's Military Advocate General's Corps. "If they provide a statement that they intend to breach, that is enough, and [interception] can be done on the high seas."  (Times of Israel)
  • Hamas Owns Several Ships in Greta Thunberg Flotilla - Jonathan Sacerdoti
    The latest Gaza flotilla is nothing more than a Hamas-led provocation, carefully orchestrated to create confrontation at sea under the cover of "aid." Hamas leadership is pulling the strings. Most passengers have no idea they are sailing under the command of a terror organization.
        Key organizers are senior Hamas operatives in Europe. One heads a Hamas-affiliated body abroad and runs a shell company in Spain which owns some of the vessels. Another, operating out of London, has been designated by Israel since 2012 as a senior Hamas activist. This is not a grassroots civilian initiative, it is a Hamas operation, pre-planned, coordinated, and unlawful.
        This flotilla is about provocation. Its purpose is confrontation with Israel, to break a lawful naval blockade and provide Hamas with a propaganda victory. A blockade must be enforced uniformly. Any exception risks undermining the entire operation. This is why Israel cannot and will not allow Hamas's flotilla to pass.
        The writer is a British broadcaster, journalist, and TV producer.  (Substack)


  • Recognition of a Palestinian State

  • A Palestinian State for Hamas - Editorial
    This week, France, the UK, Australia, Canada and some others recognized a Palestinian state as punishment for Israel. They hardly even pretend that Palestine meets the criteria for statehood. Instead they use recognition as a political statement against the Israeli war effort.
        "Why are all these countries recognizing Palestine now?" Hamas Politburo member Ghazi Hamad asked on Al Jazeera. "The fruits of Oct. 7" - the 2023 massacre that he vows to repeat - "are what caused the world to open its eyes to the Palestinian cause." Slaughter Jews, hold hostages long enough, use enough Gazans as human shields, and you get your own state.
        Hamas opposes a two-state solution because that solution requires Palestinians to make peace with Israel. But these recognitions disconnect statehood from any peace agreement, granting recognition even without reconciliation. They give Hamas what it wants. Why not demand that steps toward peace come first? Why not condition recognition on the release of all hostages and exile of Hamas?
        These recognition moves bring a Palestinian state no closer. On Oct. 7, 2023, Israelis saw one vision of Palestinian nationalism in action. They also saw Hamas gain support among Palestinians afterward, and Israel condemned for fighting back. Israelis will now need to see something different from Palestinians to be convinced that murdering Jews isn't their nationalism's essence.
        Why should Israelis believe a West Bank state wouldn't soon look like Gaza and prepare another Oct. 7-style attack? And that the world wouldn't blame Israel in the aftermath? The Palestinians have consistently chosen the struggle to destroy Israel rather than the offer of a state alongside it. To say, let them have both is to make Hamas's day. (Wall Street Journal)
  • Germany Has Shown How to Handle the Palestine Question - Henry Donovan
    German chancellor Friedrich Merz has done something almost unthinkable for a modern European leader: he has chosen virtue over virtue-signaling. Merz has dared to say what ought to be obvious: Hamas is the obstacle to a real two-state-solution. Until it is stripped of power in Gaza, there can be no peace, no security and no Palestinian state worth the name. That is not cruelty; it is realism.
        Merz has insisted that Hamas cannot be allowed a role in Gaza's future and that hostage release and disarmament are non-negotiable. This is the minimum moral logic of diplomacy. A peace plan that includes Hamas is not a peace plan at all - it is surrender to fanaticism and rewards the wrong side.
        Recognition of a Palestinian state under Hamas is no gift to Palestinians; it is a curse. It entrenches their captivity under men who profit from conflict. If Europe truly wants peace, it must pair recognition with coercion: disarmament, governance reform, and guarantees that extremists are driven from power. That is the only humane path for both Israelis and Palestinians. (Telegraph-UK)
  • The UN Is Entertaining Dangerous Palestinian Adventurism - Israeli UN Ambassador Danny Danon
    This year's UN General Assembly session is about to make a dangerous spectacle out of entertaining Palestinian adventurism, with no regard for the violent actors driving the Palestinian cause. Historical amnesia has kicked in.
        Nearly two years after the Oct. 7 massacre - where over 1,200 civilians, including women and children, were brutally murdered, and more than 250 people were taken hostage - the assembly has yet to pass a formal, unequivocal condemnation of Hamas.
        Instead of demanding the immediate and unconditional release of the 48 hostages still held in Gaza who remain trapped in inhumane conditions, the UN has focused on symbolic gestures that reward instead of sanction terror.
        If the UN wants to remain relevant and credible, it must stop being a platform for political games and start standing up for the values it was created to uphold 80 years ago. That means unequivocally condemning terrorism. That means demanding the release of hostages. And that means insisting on peace, not political theater. (Jerusalem Post)


  • Qatar

  • Israel's Strike on Hamas in Qatar Sends Strategic Regional Messages - Maj. (res.) Raphael Benlevi
    Israel's near-hit against the Hamas leadership assembled in Doha did not undo the Gulf states' interest in countering the Islamist threat represented by Hamas and supported by Qatar, nor their interest in avoiding a military confrontation with Israel. In the future, Israel's demonstration of operational capabilities may actually serve as a catalyst for deepening relations in the Arab world, since it strengthens Israel's image as a regional power with unparalleled capabilities.
        The strike's main achievements lie in the messages it conveyed. Israel broadcast that its precision operational capabilities extend far beyond its borders, and that it is determined to pursue its enemies wherever they may be. It also signaled a willingness to act with deception and surprise, which in practice strengthens its deterrence.
        In addition, an Israeli shift in its approach to Qatar is long overdue. It must recognize Qatar as the hostile state that it is, despite the current security cooperation between Qatar and the U.S. The strike demonstrated that Israel will no longer pretend that its enemies' most significant supporter can also serve as a trusted mediator.
        Finally, the most direct message was at Hamas: Israel will no longer allow it to stall Israel's military progress in Gaza through endless negotiations that lead nowhere.
        The writer is a senior fellow at the Misgav Institute for National Security and Zionist Strategy.  (Jerusalem Post)
  • Qatar Is a Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Haven - Clifford D. May
    Qatar's rulers have been funding Hamas for nearly two decades and formally hosting leaders since 2012. Nevertheless, they claim they are honest brokers mediating between warring parties. Israel's leaders decided to treat the Hamas bigwigs in Qatar as the terrorist masters they are rather than the earnest negotiators they pretended to be.
        Harboring terrorists violates fundamental international law. Based on that law, Israel has the same right to target Hamas leaders wherever they are that the U.S. had when it targeted Osama bin Laden in Pakistan, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in Syria, Qasem Soleimani in Iraq, Ayman al-Zawahiri in Afghanistan, and other terrorists in other countries.
        The Qataris are aligned with - and bankroll - the Muslim Brotherhood, of which Hamas is the Gaza branch. At the same time, they've been spending billions of dollars insinuating Islamism into America's educational system, spreading lucre among Washington influentials, and disinforming the "international community," not least via Al Jazeera, their international propaganda conglomerate.
        The writer is founder and president of FDD.  (Foundation for Defense of Democracies)


  • Israeli Security

  • From Deterrence to Proactive Offense: Oct. 7 Reshaped IDF Doctrine, Technology, and Urban Warfighting - Yaakov Lappin
    Hamas's mass murder attack on Oct. 7, 2023, has transformed the IDF's main strategic doctrine and its operational tactics for enabling long-term urban warfare. At the heart of this change is the doctrinal directive that concepts of deterrence and containment must be replaced by a proactive and continuous dismantling of enemy capabilities as they form around Israel, both near and far.
        Enemy intentions and ideological commitment to eradicating the Jewish state in order to create an Islamic state and eventually a global caliphate must be taken at face value.
        Israel's previous conceptual framework assumed that adversaries could be managed through calibrated responses. However, this approach failed to account for the ideological and religious motivations of jihadist decision-makers, who are willing to incur immense costs to achieve their ultimate goal of eradicating Israel. Israel's new perspective is inherently offensive and replaces its passive-defensive posture. It is supported by a daily willingness to engage in proactive strikes to prevent threats from ever reaching the border.
        Israel's ongoing multi-arena war has highlighted the increasing significance of real-time intelligence, UAVs, artificial intelligence, digital command systems, and satellites as indispensable assets in modern warfare, transforming intelligence gathering, strike capabilities, and battle management.
        The IDF employs Elbit's Digital Ground Army system to maneuver across enemy territory in a coordinated manner. Battlefield digital maps, offering multiple levels of situational awareness, display the precise locations of soldiers, vehicles, and the enemy, allowing commanders to order firepower strikes through screen interfaces. During the IDF's preemptive operation against Iran's nuclear facilities and ballistic missile infrastructure, UAVs executed 500 strikes and interdictions within Iranian territory.
        The war against Hamas in Gaza has decisively demonstrated that while airpower and intelligence are crucial, they alone cannot achieve decisive tactical or strategic results in complex urban environments, emphasizing the centrality of an active and capable ground army. (Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security)
Observations:

  • The outrage against Israel, fanned by a resourceful and utterly dishonest propaganda machine that often mixes fake news and biased reports to exaggerate and fabricate stories of Israeli cruelty, benefits from a global double standard. The atrocities and horrors of the Sudanese civil war dwarf anything happening in Gaza, and the world yawns.
  • But Western leaders who flaunt their self-perceived moral purity as they condemn Israel forget the foundations on which they stand. Today's liberal, rules-based Western order is the product of a far bloodier history than anything Israelis have done or even could do in Gaza.
  • The liberal world order is grounded on the Allied victory in World War II. The Allies, like the Israelis, weren't the aggressors in that war, but in their efforts to extirpate the scourges of Nazi nihilism and Japanese militarism, they killed as many as three million German and another one million Japanese civilians. More than 11 million Germans were forced from their long-term homes in Poland and Czechoslovakia after the guns fell silent, often in winter amid terrible shortages of food, medicine and safe water.
  • Franklin D. Roosevelt, Winston Churchill and British Labour leader Clement Attlee scoffed at suggestions that the Allies provide humanitarian aid to enemy civilians while the war continued. Allied demands for unconditional surrender were issued in the full knowledge that they would likely prolong the war and increase civilian suffering.
  • But in FDR's view, the Germans had been willing to venture another world war because the first one had ended without any serious fighting inside Germany itself. Real peace could come only if the Germans and the Japanese had the spirit of resistance beaten out of them.
  • Western leaders who insist that Israel's actions are historically unprecedented and morally unjustifiable betray an ignorance of history and unseriousness of purpose that raise fundamental questions about their fitness for the offices they hold.

    The writer, a fellow at the Hudson Institute, is Professor of Strategy and Statecraft at the University of Florida.
Support Daily Alert
Daily Alert is the work of a team of expert analysts who find the most important and timely articles from around the world on Israel, the Middle East and U.S. policy. No wonder it is read by heads of government, leading journalists, and thousands of people who want to stay on top of the news. To continue to provide this service, Daily Alert requires your support. Please take a moment to click here and make your contribution through the Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs.

Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs
Daily Alert is published on Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.
Unsubscribe from Daily Alert.