DAILY ALERT
Sunday,
July 27, 2025
In-Depth Issues:

U.S. Leaves Gaza Ceasefire Talks, Says Hamas Doesn't Want to End Fighting - Felicia Schwartz (Politico)
    The U.S. is pulling out of talks for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, as it believes Hamas isn't negotiating seriously, special envoy Steve Witkoff said Thursday.
    He said the group's latest response in the talks in Doha illustrated its unwillingness to end the fighting.
    "Hamas does not appear to be coordinated or acting in good faith," Witkoff said.
    "We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza. It is a shame that Hamas has acted in this selfish way. We are resolute in seeking an end to this conflict and a permanent peace in Gaza."



Israel and Syria Discuss De-escalation in Druze Region - Itamar Eichner (Ynet News)
    U.S. Special Envoy to Syria Amb. Tom Barrack said Thursday he acted as a mediator at direct talks in Paris between Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer, National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi, and Syrian Foreign Minister Hassan al-Shibani.
    According to the Syrian Center for Human Rights, under the proposed agreement between Israel and Syria, all tribal (Bedouin) and General Security forces must withdraw beyond the Druze villages in Sweida province, with a U.S. monitoring commitment to oversee implementation.
    Quneitra and Daraa provinces, near the Israeli border, will be disarmed; local security committees will be formed that will not possess heavy weapons.
    More than 1,300 people were killed in the deadly clashes in Sweida province.
    One video on social media, dated July 15, shows a group of young men being shot dead in Tishrin Square in Sweida.
    Other footage depicts Druze captives being humiliated and killed in cruel ways, including forced to jump from balconies while gunmen fired on them.



USAID Dismisses Mountain of Evidence Showing Hamas Steals Humanitarian Aid - Ezra Taylor (Jerusalem Post)
    A deeply flawed U.S. government analysis, published by Reuters on Friday, astonishingly concluded there was no evidence of systematic theft by Hamas of U.S.-funded humanitarian supplies.
    This analysis conspicuously ignored a mountain of evidence demonstrating systematic aid theft by Hamas.
    The U.S. study relied entirely on self-reporting from aid organizations operating in what analysts describe as a "mafia-like" environment controlled by Hamas through violence and intimidation.
    "No organization wants to admit it handed over some aid to terrorists or mafia gunmen," noted a Jerusalem Post analysis in May. "The organizations also know if they condemn Hamas, then they could be in danger."
    "They [Hamas] live on the aid...they want aid to come in through the United Nations and international organizations so they can steal it," one Gaza resident told an IDF Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) officer in May.
    A civilian employed by World Central Kitchen confirmed: "When the supplies arrive, they try to steal."
    David Mencer, spokesman for the Prime Minister's Office, said: "Israel facilitates thousands of aid trucks into Gaza, but we know from multiple intelligence and international sources that Hamas diverts between 30% and 50% of that aid for its own use."
    "They steal food, fuel, and medicine meant for civilians, hoard it in their tunnels, and sell it on the black market to fund their war machine."



In Gaza City, IDF Is Fighting Infrastructure, Not Terrorists - Emanuel Fabian (Times of Israel)
    The IDF is again battling Hamas in Gaza City. Last week, this reporter entered Gaza and saw excavators demolishing a building suspected of being booby trapped.
    Lt.-Col. A. said that a day earlier, troops in a nearby building found a "communications box" with wires coming out of it and a bomb hidden next to it. The same kind of box was spotted by troops using a drone in the building that was being demolished.
    "This is what fighting a Hamas battalion looks like. There's a certain number of operatives tasked with defending an area. Sometimes, they will come out of tunnels to attack if they have the opportunity. However, you mainly find yourself fighting against the infrastructure that they have prepared," he said.
    Hamas's Daraj-Tuffah Battalion "heavily relies on its infrastructure, which is mostly above ground, in the homes and yards, and a bit below ground as well. And from here we derive our method. If you take away the infrastructure that can be used to harm your forces, you advance the mission of destroying the Hamas battalion."
    Lt.-Col. A. said, "Fighting an idea, trying to eliminate an idea, is impossible, but you can kill those who hold that idea, or take away the capabilities that allow them to act effectively."
    His forces had not yet encountered any Hamas operatives, nor any civilians, during its operations in Daraj and Tuffah.
    Using drones, they had identified gunmen deeper within Gaza City and launched strikes on them.
    He said he was operating under the assumption that at least 15 Hamas operatives were hiding in his area of operations, inside tunnels that IDF forces had not yet found.



British Hostage Emily Damari Tells of Being Held in a Cage in the Gaza Tunnels - Andy Jehring (Daily Mail-UK)
    For almost four months of her 471 days in captivity, Emily Damari, 29, was incarcerated in the Hamas terror tunnels under Gaza, where the stench of human waste permeated the fetid wet air and the floor crawled with cockroaches.
    Throughout it all she was in constant, searing pain after gunmen shot off two of her fingers the day she was kidnapped on Oct. 7, 2023, while the remains of another bullet were lodged in her right leg.
    Emily says: "Sometimes there would be up to six of us at a time, squeezed in a tiny cage just two meters by two meters."
    Finally freed in a ceasefire deal in January, she now reveals the full horrors of what she suffered.



Gaza Humanitarian Foundation Rejects False Claims by Former Aid Worker (Times of Israel)
    The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) has refuted claims aired on BBC on Friday by former GHF aid worker Anthony Aguilar that Israel was committing "war crimes" in Gaza.
    The GHF said Aguilar made "false claims with no basis in reality."
    "Upon hearing Mr. Aguilar's claims, we immediately launched an investigation. The findings, based on cross-checking the timelines with video clips and on sources on the ground, indicate that these are false claims with no basis in reality."
    "It should be emphasized that Mr. Aguilar was employed as a subcontractor and was fired over a month ago for inappropriate behavior. Following the dismissal, we received threats that unless he was reinstated, action would be taken against us, raising questions regarding the motivation behind his interviews."
    "We continue to focus on our core mission: to provide food to the residents of Gaza - safely, directly and without interruption, as we have been doing since the beginning of operations on May 27."
    "Since then, we have distributed more than 92 million rations to the Palestinian residents of Gaza."




News Resources - North America, Europe, and Asia:
  • Trump Tells Israel to "Finish the Job" Against Hamas - Kevin Liptak
    President Trump pulled back his negotiators from Gaza ceasefire talks last week after the U.S. deemed Hamas not "acting in good faith." Trump signaled Friday it was time for Israel to escalate its military campaign. "I think they want to die, and it's very, very bad. It got to a point where you're gonna have to finish the job. They're gonna have to fight and they're gonna have to clean it up. You're gonna have to get rid of 'em."
        Trump blamed the breakdown in talks squarely on Hamas. "Now we're down to the final hostages, and they know what happens after you get the final hostages, and basically, because of that, they really didn't want to make a deal."
        Trump said it was Hamas that was preventing aid from being distributed, and that the U.S. hadn't received enough credit for the help it had already provided. "People don't know this, and we didn't certainly get any acknowledgement or thank you, but we contributed $60 million to food and supplies and everything else. We hope the money gets there, because you know, that money gets taken. The food gets taken. We're going to do more, but we gave a lot of money."  (CNN)
  • Tehran's Infrastructure to Finish a Bomb Is Shattered - David Ignatius
    There's growing evidence that Iran's nuclear program suffered such severe damage that it will be neutered for at least a year, and probably far longer. "Iran is no longer a threshold nuclear state," one well-informed Israeli source told me. He said that Iran would now require at least one to two years to build a deliverable nuclear weapon, assuming it could somehow hide its activities.
        Israeli and American sources said the bombing campaign, in addition to destroying many of the Iranian centrifuges that enrich uranium, shattered most elements of Iran's aggressive program to prepare to weaponize that uranium.
        The most devastating aspect of Israel's campaign may have been its targeting of Iran's leading nuclear scientists. Sources said strikes in the first hours of the war killed all of Iran's first and second tier of physicists and other nuclear scientists, as well as most of the third tier. That's a massive loss of talent, and Israeli officials believe it will deter younger Iranian scientists from participating in a program that proved to be a death sentence.
        An Israeli source said strikes buried a site where Iran had hidden 400 kg. of highly enriched uranium. Israeli attacks also destroyed logistical foundations of the nuclear program, including its headquarters, archives, laboratories and testing equipment. (Washington Post)
  • U.S. "Strongly Rejects" French Plan to Recognize Palestinian State
    U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio blasted French President Emmanuel Macron's announcement on Thursday that France intends to recognize a Palestinian state in September at the UN General Assembly. Rubio said, "The United States strongly rejects Emmanuel Macron's plan to recognize a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly. This reckless decision only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace. It is a slap in the face to the victims of October 7th."  (France 24)
        See also Netanyahu: A Palestinian State Would Try to Annihilate Israel - Lazar Berman
    Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Thursday he "strongly condemns President Macron's decision to recognize a Palestinian state next to Tel Aviv in the wake of the Oct. 7 massacre. Such a move rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy, just as Gaza became. A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel - not to live in peace beside it. Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel."  (Times of Israel)
        See also Israeli Foreign Minister: A Palestinian State Will Be a Hamas State
    Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said Thursday: "The French President's pretension to create by mere words an illusionary arrangement in our land is ridiculous and not serious. His statement this evening shows that all the conditions that he himself set a few weeks ago - have evaporated. All that remains is the illusionary state he presumes to establish. A Palestinian state will be a Hamas state, just as the withdrawal from Gaza twenty years ago led to Hamas taking control of it."
        "Israel's attempt to base its security on Palestinian promises to fight terror completely failed in the Oslo process. Israel will no longer gamble on its security and its future."  (Jerusalem Post)
News Resources - Israel and the Mideast:
  • IDF Announces Daily Humanitarian Pause in Parts of Gaza to Facilitate Aid Delivery - Yoav Zitun
    The IDF on Sunday announced a daily "tactical pause" in combat operations in select areas of Gaza to facilitate the delivery and distribution of humanitarian aid. The pause, in effect from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m., will apply to areas where Israeli troops are not currently operating. In addition, designated secure routes will be open from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. to allow for the safe movement of aid convoys transporting food and medicine throughout Gaza.
        On Saturday night, the Israeli Air Force conducted its first aid airdrop - delivering 7 pallets of flour, sugar and canned food provided by international organizations. The IDF also connected a power line to Gaza's southern desalination plant, increasing daily water production from 2,000 to 20,000 cubic meters, serving roughly 900,000 residents. (Ynet News)
  • Egypt Blasts Hamas Leaders: "They Don't Care about Gaza" - Danny Zaken
    When Hamas presented new demands in the final day of the Gaza ceasefire discussions in Qatar for the release of live terrorists serving life sentences or lengthy terms for murdering Israelis in exchange for the remains of hostages, Egyptian officials erupted in anger, with a shouting match that lasted several minutes. An Arab source told Israel Hayom that the Egyptians accused Hamas representatives of callous disregard for their own population in Gaza.
        A senior Palestinian official also slammed key Hamas leaders, saying, "They are prepared to fight to the last drop of Gaza's children's blood while they themselves sit in villas in Qatar and Turkey. They don't understand that this round is over. They brought disaster upon Gaza and are now clinging to the remnants of their military power just to say they weren't defeated."
        An Arab official involved in the talks told Israel Hayom, "Hamas leadership is behaving as if it's still Oct. 8, holding hundreds of hostages and controlling the entire Gaza Strip - not in the current reality where it controls almost nothing, tens of thousands of Palestinians are dead, the Strip's cities are in ruins, and the displaced are starving."  (Israel Hayom)
  • Israeli Security Forces Foil Separate Terrorist Attacks at Two Communities in Judea - Yoav Zitun
    Israeli security forces on Friday neutralized a Palestinian terrorist armed with a knife near the Shim'a community south of Hebron and another approaching Kibbutz Migdal Oz in the Gush Etzion area. (Ynet News)
  • Israel Seizes Gaza-Bound Protest Ship in Mediterranean - Lior Ben Ari
    Israeli naval forces seized control of the protest vessel Handala on Saturday night as it attempted to approach Gaza. (Ynet News)
Global Commentary and Think-Tank Analysis:

    Gaza

  • "Finishing the Job" in Gaza: What It Means and What It Takes - Maj. (ret.) John Spencer
    Hamas has refused to negotiate the return of hostages or discuss disarmament. President Trump recently said, "It got to a point where you're gonna have to finish the job." But what does "finishing the job" in Gaza actually mean?
        Global recognition of Israel's legitimate and just war objectives must be the starting point. Many voices calling for an immediate ceasefire argue that the war can end without removing Hamas's military capabilities or political power. That position is fundamentally flawed. Any resolution that allows Hamas to retain power, even partially, ensures that the group will rebuild and repeat this cycle of violence in the future. Only the full military and political removal of Hamas from Gaza can create the conditions necessary for peace.
        Humanitarian assistance must be delivered through mechanisms that do not rely on or empower Hamas. By restoring food access outside of Hamas control, Israel helps shift civilian reliance away from Hamas's shadow governance.
        While headlines often focus on warnings of famine, more food is now flowing into Gaza. Hundreds of UN aid trucks are being distributed daily. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) continues to deliver up to two million meals a day across four sites. It has also established a system that allows approved groups to pick up aid and deliver it to the most vulnerable areas.
        The Israel Defense Forces will continue to enter contested areas to systematically target Hamas fighters, dismantle Hamas infrastructure, and clear Gaza of their military presence. This is a slow, deliberate, and dangerous process involving close-quarters combat and tunnel detection and destruction. This cannot and should not be rushed.
        This is not a call for a forever war in Gaza. This is a clear-eyed statement of what it will take to take the guns from Hamas. This is the essential first step. Before anything meaningful can be built, the threat must be removed. Once areas are cleared of Hamas, Israel can begin to explore what force will provide security, and which Palestinian actors can help stabilize areas. But none of that is possible if Hamas remains intact.
        The writer is chair of urban warfare studies at the Modern War Institute at West Point.  (X)
  • Accusations of Israeli Genocide Are Untenable - Prof. Hillel Frisch
    Brown University professor Omer Bartov made headlines last week for accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. The real question is whether Israel can deal with a genocidal movement such as Hamas, so embedded in Gaza's civilian population, in any other way than the path it has taken during almost two years of war.
        Whether Hamas is genocidal, seeking the physical destruction of seven million Jewish Israelis, is beyond dispute. Hamas documented their own war crimes using body cameras as they slaughtered, burned, and raped their victims.
        The Americans and the British knew that in the war with Nazi Germany, German civilians would be killed in the tens of thousands. Should Roosevelt and Eisenhower be accused of committing genocide against the German people? Should the genocide charge be leveled at Harry Truman, who made the decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Or were these decisions ultimately justified in ushering in the end to these evil powers and shortening a devastating war?
        Bartov would do better to marshal his knowledge to propose how Israel should conduct a justifiable war against the forces of evil in a manner that would reduce civilian collateral damage in a densely urban area like Gaza, in which the enemy is ensconced in hundreds of kilometers of concrete and steel-reinforced tunnels, built from materials that Hamas siphoned off from international aid.
        The writer is professor emeritus at Bar-Ilan University and a senior researcher at the Jerusalem Institute for Strategy and Security.  (Jerusalem Post)
  • Hamas's Disappearing Responsibility for Gaza's Suffering - Prof. Jeffrey Herf
    Describing Israel's wars of self-defense as examples of genocide has been an effective but false tool of political warfare for decades. My rejoinder as a historian is to focus instead on the conceptual problem in the genocide accusation, namely, the disappearance of the responsibility of Hamas for launching a war of extermination, and then for fighting the resulting war with a strategy intended to maximize death and suffering in Gaza. Professor Bartov attributed genocidal intent where it does not exist and ignores it where it does.
        The clearly articulated consensus of the Israeli government is to wage war to defeat Hamas, but not to wage war against the people of Gaza. Bartov refuses to give any causal significance to the ideology, agency, and responsibility of Hamas for launching a war of aggression and extermination. He is that most unusual historian who writes about a war as if there is only one actor involved. Since its 1988 founding charter, Hamas leaders over many years have proudly expressed their intent to destroy the state of Israel and kill its citizens by force of arms.
        Hamas and the attack of Oct. 7 are not figments of the imagination of Israeli officials who supposedly and cynically use the memory of the Holocaust to wage unnecessary wars against non-existent threats. The threats exist. Any government of Israel committed to the defense of the lives of its citizens would have to fight a war to defeat Hamas and ensure that it did not return to power in Gaza.
        The writer is professor emeritus in the Department of History at the University of Maryland, College Park. (Times of Israel)
        See also Debunking the Genocide Allegations: A Reexamination of the Israel-Hamas War (2023-2025) - Danny Orbach et al. (Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies-Bar Ilan University)


  • Iran

  • Israeli F-16I Navigator Discusses Striking Iran - Howard Altman
    The Israeli Air Force (IAF) is in the midst of one of the fiercest operational tempos in its history. In addition to bombing Gaza, the IAF has attacked targets in Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and has executed a high-risk air war against Iran after decades of planning. We talked in-depth to one of the IAF's most experienced F-16I navigators about what it's like to fly and fight in the highly customized Israel-specific variant of the F-16.
        Lt.-Col. I., a Druze aviator, said, "The F-16I is more likely to be the plane that goes as far as possible, because we have extra fuel tanks." The F-16I has different equipment than other variants of the F-16, "like long-range missiles, weapons or smart bombs."
        "The planes actually talk to each other....We can see the information inside the other planes without even the need to talk to each other....We can see on the map all the details that the other planes in our formation do, like if they lock on the target. I can see that he locked on a target. So I can take the other target that my wingman didn't."
        The navigator is a weapon systems operator. "If it's an attack mission, most of the crucial decisions are made by the navigator. I choose the target, I lock on it, I see in my formation which is the better way to attack the target, and I decide how we do this. If it's an air-to-air mission against aircraft or other missions that don't include a ground attack, the pilot is the mission commander....The navigator is also responsible for the defense of each aircraft and the formation and for operating the weapons - the missiles and the bombs."
        The F-35s "gave us a lot of information that other planes like the F-16I don't have. They have a lot of equipment that helps them determine which missiles are heading towards us....[We] let the F-35 go first, see what's going on, gather the intelligence and information and give it to us and to the other planes, and then we take this information and attack."
        He took part in the Iran mission. "After we landed from the first mission, we were very pleased with the outcome. We didn't expect this kind of success....This mission is exactly an example of the Israeli Air Force's ability to take a mission and, with precision and strategic depth, execute it at a very high level....Just as we headed back west and we saw all the other planes that were coming from Israel, that feeling was unbelievable, a feeling of success and power, that we are doing something historical."
        "They didn't fire a single anti-aircraft missile towards us in the whole war. They did against drones, but against jet pilots, not even once....We had a belief that we were going to come back from the flight and we will see our base bombed already. But nothing happened."  (The War Zone)
        See also The First Druze Aviator in the Israeli Air Force - Howard Altman (The War Zone)


  • Israel and the West

  • Israel Wants the Same Rights as Every Other Nation - Leslie Roberts
    Every time Israel defends itself, people are quick to condemn. Every time it fights to exist, critics demand it explain itself. But what would you do if your neighbors wanted to burn your house down? The day Israel declared independence, five Arab armies attacked because they couldn't accept a Jewish state.
        On Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas crossed into Israel and carried out one of the worst massacres of Jews since the Holocaust. They murdered babies, burned families alive, and took hostages. It wasn't resistance. It was hatred, deliberate and unrelenting. And still, when Israel fights back, the world tells it to be measured, to show restraint. Try diplomacy, they say, with people who want to kill them.
        UN panels, human rights groups, politicians and celebrities line up to judge Israel by a different standard. They just expect Israel to take the punches and apologize for surviving. Why are the rules different? Israel is doing what any nation would do under attack. The double standard is dangerous. It tells a global audience that Jewish suffering is negotiable, and that Jewish self-defense is somehow unacceptable.
        The Jewish people have had to learn to survive in every kind of darkness, to rebuild in the ashes, and to grow stronger than those who tried to destroy them. That strength isn't aggression. It's resilience. It's experience. And it's what keeps Israel alive today. Israel isn't asking for sympathy. It's asking for the same right every nation demands, the right to defend itself, and the right to live. (National Post-Canada)
  • Granting Palestinian Statehood Does Not Make Moral or Practical Sense - Jake Wallis Simons
    Hamas has warmly welcomed French President Macron's announcement that France was planning to recognize a state of Palestine. To put this in perspective, I suggest that Mr. Macron watch some of the footage of Oct. 7.
        Perhaps the scene in which Ahmed Fozi Wadia, a Hamas paraglider, strolled into the home of the Taasa family in Netiv Ha'asara inside Israel and shot 17-year-old Or six times in the head. He then threw a grenade into the saferoom where the rest of the family was hiding. Or's father, Gil, a fireman, threw himself onto the grenade to protect his other children and was killed instantly. Two of his sons were injured in the blast, with 8-year-old Shay's eye blown out of its socket.
        Well done, Mr. Macron. These are the people who are slapping you on the back. Unilaterally recognizing a Palestinian state stands out as the most myopic, destructive and treacherous foreign policy to have been dreamed up by our elites in recent memory.
        Granting statehood to one of the most corrupt, brutal, inept and intransigent regimes on Earth - which has something of a taste for terrorism, given that it hands out financial rewards to those convicted of it - in order to pressure a democratic ally out of winning against the jihadis, makes no sense either for stability in the Middle East or our own national security. (Telegraph-UK)
Observations:

  • There is a Gaza ceasefire deal on the table, but Hamas delays. It dithers over clauses, sends out positive signals only to later walk them back. It's about a deal that could relieve the unbearable conditions of the very people Hamas claims to represent. Yet, Hamas haggles. It stalls. And the longer it delays, the more the spotlight shifts - toward Israel. The world places nearly all the blame and responsibility on Israel, as though Hamas has nothing to do with the dire food shortages.
  • And in so doing, the international community only prolongs the suffering. Each angry UN condemnation, each news report that shows scenes of devastation without critical context, each harsh statement from Western democracies gives Hamas oxygen. And Hamas calculates that by dragging this out longer - by letting the death toll tick higher - the world will eventually force Israel's hand.
  • There's no mention at all about Hamas's responsibility for any of this. Nothing about Hamas's role in the death of Palestinians seeking aid, because it wants to thwart any aid delivery mechanism not under its control.
  • Today, with negotiations at another critical juncture, history repeats itself: as soon as diplomatic progress seems possible, a wave of external pressure targets Israel, Hamas publicly celebrates, and the incentive for it to compromise disappears. International actors, whether intentionally or not, are providing Hamas both political cover and motivation to prolong the conflict.
  • Brett McGurk, the Biden administration's former National Security Council coordinator for the Middle East and one of its top hostage deal negotiators, told the Aspen Security Forum on July 16 that a Gaza deal was nearly reached in May 2024. "On May 7, there was a deal on the table that gave Hamas 85% of everything it wanted that could have stopped the war the next day, but Hamas did not answer" until six weeks later, when it "fundamentally changed the whole thing."
  • On August 16, another deal was offered, this time one that "had about 95% of what Hamas wanted, and again they did not say yes, they did not answer. This war could have stopped at multiple times if Hamas stopped the war and released hostages."
  • The claim that Israel - not Hamas - is the main obstacle to a deal contradicts what key figures directly involved in the negotiations are saying. They are senior officials speaking publicly and on the record. In January, former Secretary of State Antony Blinken was asked by the New York Times whether Netanyahu blocked a ceasefire last July that could have led to the hostages' release. His reply: "No, that's not accurate. What we've seen time and again is Hamas not concluding a deal that it should have concluded."

Jerusalem Center for Security and Foreign Affairs
Daily Alert is published on Sunday, Tuesday, and Thursday.
Unsubscribe from Daily Alert.