Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(BESA Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan Univesity) Douglas Feith - Early on I saw that Oslo was more about Israeli withdrawal than peace. In 1993, when the first Oslo agreement was published, there were a few vague words in the preamble about striving for peaceful coexistence, but in the operative sections there were no actual peace promises. The Declaration of Principles (DOP) said simply that Israel would withdraw from parts of the territories and transfer responsibilities to the Arab party. The DOP was an exchange of land for nothing. Arafat had no intention of agreeing that Israel had a right to exist permanently. He took what Israel was willing to give up, but he didn't make peace. He didn't preach peace. He didn't have Palestinian schools teach peace. He didn't enforce peace. The writer, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, served as U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy (2001-2005). 2018-09-14 00:00:00Full Article
Oslo Pretended to Be a Peace Process
(BESA Center for Strategic Studies-Bar-Ilan Univesity) Douglas Feith - Early on I saw that Oslo was more about Israeli withdrawal than peace. In 1993, when the first Oslo agreement was published, there were a few vague words in the preamble about striving for peaceful coexistence, but in the operative sections there were no actual peace promises. The Declaration of Principles (DOP) said simply that Israel would withdraw from parts of the territories and transfer responsibilities to the Arab party. The DOP was an exchange of land for nothing. Arafat had no intention of agreeing that Israel had a right to exist permanently. He took what Israel was willing to give up, but he didn't make peace. He didn't preach peace. He didn't have Palestinian schools teach peace. He didn't enforce peace. The writer, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, served as U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy (2001-2005). 2018-09-14 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|