Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Asharq Al-Awsat-UK) Hiba Al-Qudsi - In an interview, Gamal Helal, a former adviser to U.S. presidents for Middle East affairs, said the Arab stance toward negotiations always started and ended on the consideration that the 1967 borders are the basis of negotiations. However, the surprise is that Obama has considered this principle from now on to be the basis of U.S. policy in the issue of the Middle East peace process. "The U.S. stance in all the past years has been to agree to the solutions agreed by the sides through the negotiations without the United States stipulating anything, so that this stipulation would not be an obstacle at the negotiations." "This new thesis, which President Obama presented in his Thursday speech, supports the Arab viewpoint, and is a basic hindrance for the Israeli side, which links the size of Israel before 1967 to the ability to defend it." 2011-05-23 00:00:00Full Article
Obama Bases U.S. Policy on Pre-'67 Lines
(Asharq Al-Awsat-UK) Hiba Al-Qudsi - In an interview, Gamal Helal, a former adviser to U.S. presidents for Middle East affairs, said the Arab stance toward negotiations always started and ended on the consideration that the 1967 borders are the basis of negotiations. However, the surprise is that Obama has considered this principle from now on to be the basis of U.S. policy in the issue of the Middle East peace process. "The U.S. stance in all the past years has been to agree to the solutions agreed by the sides through the negotiations without the United States stipulating anything, so that this stipulation would not be an obstacle at the negotiations." "This new thesis, which President Obama presented in his Thursday speech, supports the Arab viewpoint, and is a basic hindrance for the Israeli side, which links the size of Israel before 1967 to the ability to defend it." 2011-05-23 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|