Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Quarterly) Ariel E. Levite - Israel's declaratory policy has always embraced nuclear disarmament as a coveted end-state. At the Conference on Disarmament on September 4, 1997, Israel formally committed to a vision of a Middle East free from nuclear and all other nonconventional weapons of destruction and ballistic missiles. Yet disarmament is seen as an end result of a long political process producing a fundamental and long-lasting transformation of relations between Israel and its neighbors. While seeing disarmament (including nuclear disarmament) as a desirable outcome, Israel nevertheless believes that it could and should not be pursued independently. Progress toward disarmament is clearly seen as a byproduct of attaining the more pressing goals of comprehensive peace and normalization. The writer is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2010-05-17 09:34:40Full Article
Global Zero: An Israeli Vision of Realistic Idealism
(Washington Quarterly) Ariel E. Levite - Israel's declaratory policy has always embraced nuclear disarmament as a coveted end-state. At the Conference on Disarmament on September 4, 1997, Israel formally committed to a vision of a Middle East free from nuclear and all other nonconventional weapons of destruction and ballistic missiles. Yet disarmament is seen as an end result of a long political process producing a fundamental and long-lasting transformation of relations between Israel and its neighbors. While seeing disarmament (including nuclear disarmament) as a desirable outcome, Israel nevertheless believes that it could and should not be pursued independently. Progress toward disarmament is clearly seen as a byproduct of attaining the more pressing goals of comprehensive peace and normalization. The writer is a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. 2010-05-17 09:34:40Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|